Mostra i principali dati dell'item

dc.contributor.authorManso Morato, Javier 
dc.contributor.authorHurtado Alonso, Nerea 
dc.contributor.authorSkaf Revenga, Marta 
dc.contributor.authorRevilla Cuesta, Víctor 
dc.contributor.authorOrtega López, Vanesa 
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-20T07:28:16Z
dc.date.available2025-05-20T07:28:16Z
dc.date.issued2025-08
dc.identifier.issn0195-9255
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10259/10485
dc.description.abstractEurope is among the most important wind-energy producers in the world, yet a commonly accepted solution is to be found towards Wind Turbine Blade Waste (WTBW) from wind turbine blades at the end of their lifespan. In this research, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), regarding Global Warming Potential (GWP) and Abiotic Depletion Potential for fossil fuels (ADPf), was first used to study landfilling, incineration and mechanical recycling of WTBW. Mechanical recycling was highlighted as the best option, as incineration showed higher impacts (x4.5 GWP, x1.2 ADPf) and landfilling is forbidden by the European Union. Afterwards, WTBW management was combined with concrete production by considering both incineration and mechanical recycling, WTBW being used as aggregate replacement (2%, 5%, and 10% vol.) to create fiber-reinforced concrete. Mechanical recycling of WTBW always yielded lower results (-28.3% GWP, -5.9% ADPf), even when including larger transportation impacts in a real case in Castilla y León (-28.0% for GWP, -5.4% for ADPf), a region in Spain among the top producers of WTBW in Europe in the next 5-10 years, which is in need for a recycling strategy to follow. Lastly, four mechanical recycling plants would be needed in Castilla y León to minimize WTBW transportation impacts, thus the average environmental damage being reduced by 0.2% GWP and 0.3% ADPf per cubic meter of ready-to-cast concrete. These key findings emphasize the benefits of mechanically recycling WTBW and its potential when combined with concrete production through LCA, yielding promising results that can be implemented in different regions around the world.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (MICIU), AEI, EU, ERDF and NextGenerationEU/PRTR [grant numbers PID2023-146642OB-I00; 10.13039/501100011033; TED2021-129715 B–I00; FPU21/04364]; the Junta de Castilla y Leon ´ (Regional Government) and ERDF [grant number UIC-231; BU033P23; BU066-22]; and, finally, the University of Burgos [grant number SUCONS, Y135. GI].es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherElsevieres
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Impact Assessment Review. 2025, V. 115, p. 107992es
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectWind turbine blade wasteen
dc.subjectLife cycle assessmenten
dc.subjectConcreteen
dc.subjectSpainen
dc.subjectOptimizationen
dc.subject.otherHormigón-Ensayoses
dc.subject.otherConcrete-Testingen
dc.subject.otherMateriales de construcciónes
dc.subject.otherBuilding materialsen
dc.titleLife cycle assessment of concrete with wind turbine blade waste: A real case studyen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107992es
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107992
dc.journal.titleEnvironmental Impact Assessment Reviewes
dc.volume.number115es
dc.page.initial107992es
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones


Files in questo item

Thumbnail

Questo item appare nelle seguenti collezioni

Mostra i principali dati dell'item