| dc.contributor.author | Ventosa Arbaizar, Edgar | |
| dc.contributor.author | Madej, Edyta | |
| dc.contributor.author | Zampardi, Giorgia | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mei, Bastian | |
| dc.contributor.author | Weide, Philipp | |
| dc.contributor.author | Antoni, Hendrik | |
| dc.contributor.author | La Mantia, Fabio | |
| dc.contributor.author | Muhler, Martin | |
| dc.contributor.author | Schuhmann, Wolfgang | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-02-17T09:28:56Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-02-17T09:28:56Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016-12 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1944-8244 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10259/11377 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The high (de)lithiation potential of TiO2 (ca. 1.7 V vs Li/Li+ in 1 M Li+) decreases the voltage and, thus, the energy density of a corresponding Li-ion battery. On the other hand, it offers several advantages such as the (de)lithiation potential far from lithium deposition or absence of a solid electrolyte interphase (SEI). The latter is currently under controversial debate as several studies reported the presence of a SEI when operating TiO2 electrodes at potentials above 1.0 V vs Li/Li+. We investigate the formation of a SEI at anatase TiO2 electrodes by means of X-ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS) and scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM). The investigations were performed in different potential ranges, namely, during storage (without external polarization), between 3.0–2.0 V and 3.0–1.0 V vs Li/Li+, respectively. No SEI is formed when a completely dried and residues-free TiO2 electrode is cycled between 3.0 and 2.0 V vs Li/Li+. A SEI is detected by XPS in the case of samples stored for 6 weeks or cycled between 3.0 and 1.0 V vs Li/Li+. With use of SECM, it is verified that this SEI does not possess the electrically insulating character as expected for a “classic” SEI. Therefore, we propose the term apparent SEI for TiO2 electrodes to differentiate it from the protecting and effective SEI formed at graphite electrodes. | en |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Financial support from the DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) in the framework of the Cluster of Excellence RESOLV (EXC1069) is gratefully acknowledged. | en |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | es |
| dc.publisher | American Chemical Society | es |
| dc.relation.ispartof | ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2016, V. 9, n. 3, p. 3123-3130 | es |
| dc.subject | Li-on batteries | en |
| dc.subject | Solid electrolyte interphase | en |
| dc.subject | X-ray photoemission | en |
| dc.subject | Scanning electrochemical microscopy | en |
| dc.subject | Titanium dioxide | en |
| dc.subject.other | Química | es |
| dc.subject.other | Chemistry | en |
| dc.subject.other | Química analítica | es |
| dc.subject.other | Chemistry, Analytic | en |
| dc.title | Solid Electrolyte Interphase (SEI) at TiO2 Electrodes in Li-Ion Batteries: Defining Apparent and Effective SEI Based on Evidence from X-ray Photoemission Spectroscopy and Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy | en |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es |
| dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es |
| dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b13306 | es |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1021/acsami.6b13306 | |
| dc.identifier.essn | 1944-8252 | |
| dc.journal.title | ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces | es |
| dc.volume.number | 9 | es |
| dc.issue.number | 3 | es |
| dc.page.initial | 3123 | es |
| dc.page.final | 3130 | es |
| dc.type.hasVersion | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion | es |
Stöbern
Gesamter BestandBereiche & SammlungenErscheinungsdatumAutorenTitelnSchlagwortenDiese SammlungErscheinungsdatumAutorenTitelnSchlagworten



