Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVentosa Arbaizar, Edgar 
dc.contributor.authorMadej, Edyta
dc.contributor.authorZampardi, Giorgia
dc.contributor.authorMei, Bastian
dc.contributor.authorWeide, Philipp
dc.contributor.authorAntoni, Hendrik
dc.contributor.authorLa Mantia, Fabio
dc.contributor.authorMuhler, Martin
dc.contributor.authorSchuhmann, Wolfgang
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-17T09:28:56Z
dc.date.available2026-02-17T09:28:56Z
dc.date.issued2016-12
dc.identifier.issn1944-8244
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10259/11377
dc.description.abstractThe high (de)lithiation potential of TiO2 (ca. 1.7 V vs Li/Li+ in 1 M Li+) decreases the voltage and, thus, the energy density of a corresponding Li-ion battery. On the other hand, it offers several advantages such as the (de)lithiation potential far from lithium deposition or absence of a solid electrolyte interphase (SEI). The latter is currently under controversial debate as several studies reported the presence of a SEI when operating TiO2 electrodes at potentials above 1.0 V vs Li/Li+. We investigate the formation of a SEI at anatase TiO2 electrodes by means of X-ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS) and scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM). The investigations were performed in different potential ranges, namely, during storage (without external polarization), between 3.0–2.0 V and 3.0–1.0 V vs Li/Li+, respectively. No SEI is formed when a completely dried and residues-free TiO2 electrode is cycled between 3.0 and 2.0 V vs Li/Li+. A SEI is detected by XPS in the case of samples stored for 6 weeks or cycled between 3.0 and 1.0 V vs Li/Li+. With use of SECM, it is verified that this SEI does not possess the electrically insulating character as expected for a “classic” SEI. Therefore, we propose the term apparent SEI for TiO2 electrodes to differentiate it from the protecting and effective SEI formed at graphite electrodes.en
dc.description.sponsorshipFinancial support from the DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) in the framework of the Cluster of Excellence RESOLV (EXC1069) is gratefully acknowledged.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherAmerican Chemical Societyes
dc.relation.ispartofACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2016, V. 9, n. 3, p. 3123-3130es
dc.subjectLi-on batteriesen
dc.subjectSolid electrolyte interphaseen
dc.subjectX-ray photoemissionen
dc.subjectScanning electrochemical microscopyen
dc.subjectTitanium dioxideen
dc.subject.otherQuímicaes
dc.subject.otherChemistryen
dc.subject.otherQuímica analíticaes
dc.subject.otherChemistry, Analyticen
dc.titleSolid Electrolyte Interphase (SEI) at TiO2 Electrodes in Li-Ion Batteries: Defining Apparent and Effective SEI Based on Evidence from X-ray Photoemission Spectroscopy and Scanning Electrochemical Microscopyen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b13306es
dc.identifier.doi10.1021/acsami.6b13306
dc.identifier.essn1944-8252
dc.journal.titleACS Applied Materials & Interfaceses
dc.volume.number9es
dc.issue.number3es
dc.page.initial3123es
dc.page.final3130es
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersiones


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record