| dc.contributor.author | García Bustillo, Álvaro | |
| dc.contributor.author | Youn, Jinyoung | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ahn, Jong Hyeon | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ojo, Oluwadamilola | |
| dc.contributor.author | Okubadejo, Njideka | |
| dc.contributor.author | Aldaajani, Zakiyah | |
| dc.contributor.author | Essam, Mohamed | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shalash, Ali | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cardozo, Adriana | |
| dc.contributor.author | Spindler, Meredith | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mari, Zoltan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cubo Delgado, Esther | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-05-12T06:27:25Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-05-12T06:27:25Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-02 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2330-1619 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10259/11607 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Overcoming existing access barriers is crucial for better-specialized health care ofpatients with Parkinson’s disease (PD).ObjectiveObjective: The aim of the study was to compare the access and visit quality/acceptability between in-office andvirtual telemedicine visits.MethodsMethods: This was an international, randomized, case-control, prospective, observational study. Patients wererandomly assigned either to the control group (in-person/in-office visits at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months) or tothe study group (in-office visits at baseline, 6, and 12 months, and telemedicine visits at 3 and 9 months).Telemedicine visits were conducted using videoconferencing apps that were readily accessible to the patient/caregivers. Outcomes were feasibility, usability, and the noninferiority of telemedicine compared to in-officevisits in PD patients regarding clinical progression and initiation of pharmacological/nonpharmacologicaltreatments over 1-year follow-up.ResultsResults: We included 209 PD patients from 6 countries (Nigeria, Spain, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Egypt, andUruguay), mean age 64.9 12.2 years, 59% males, median Hoehn & Yahr stage 2 (1–4). Overall, diseaseprogression (MDS-Unified PD rating scale), quality of life (PD-Quality of life 39-items) scores, and therapeuticchanges were similar in both groups. After 1 year, 124 patients 48.3%, (control group) and 52.1% (study group)completed the visits (P = 0.52), with a similar high rate of patient’s satisfaction with the visits (P = 0.57).ConclusionsConclusions: This study represents real-world telemedicine practice in different world regions using atelemedicine approach complementary to in-person visits. Based on these results, feasibility, clinicalmanagement, PD disease progression, and patient’s quality of life are similar when using telemedicine versusin-office visits. Future research should explore ways to integrate different healthcare technologies for long-termPD management. | en |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Edmond J. Safra Philanthropic Foundation | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | es |
| dc.publisher | Wiley | es |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Movement Disorders Clinical Practice. 2026, V. 13, n. 2, p. 419-429 | es |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
| dc.subject | Telemedicine | en |
| dc.subject | Parkinson's disease | en |
| dc.subject | Multidisciplinary team | en |
| dc.subject.other | Telemedicina | es |
| dc.subject.other | Telecommunication in medicine | en |
| dc.subject.other | Enfermedad de Parkinson | es |
| dc.subject.other | Parkinson's disease | en |
| dc.title | The Feasibility and Practical Utility of Virtual Visits for Patients with Parkinson's Disease in Different World Regions | en |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es |
| dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es |
| dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.70314 | es |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/mdc3.70314 | |
| dc.identifier.essn | 2330-1619 | |
| dc.journal.title | Movement Disorders Clinical Practice | en |
| dc.volume.number | 13 | es |
| dc.issue.number | 2 | es |
| dc.page.initial | 419 | es |
| dc.page.final | 429 | es |
| dc.type.hasVersion | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es |
| dc.description.project | Open access funding provided by FEDER European Funds and the Junta De Castilla y León under the Research and Innovation Strategy for Smart Specialization (RIS3) of Castilla y León 2021-2027 | en |
| opencost.institution.ror | https://ror.org/051jb1k20 | |
| opencost.institution.name | Consorcio de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Castilla y León (BUCLE) | es |
| opencost.cost.type | hybrid-oa | |
| opencost.costSplitting | 1 | |
| opencost.amount.paid | 2488,66 EUR | |
| opencost.invoice.number | 9100199480 | |
| opencost.invoice.creditor | John Wiley & Sons | |
| opencost.invoice.date | 2025-04-30 | |
| opencost.invoice.datePaid | 2025-11-14 | |
| opencost.participation.from | 2025-01-01 | |
| opencost.participation.to | 2028-12-31 | |
| opencost.publication.doi | 10.1002/mdc3.70314 |
Navegar
Todo o repositórioComunidades e ColeçõesPor data do documentoAutoresTítulosAssuntosEsta coleçãoPor data do documentoAutoresTítulosAssuntos



