<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-29T10:21:52Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/10120" metadataPrefix="didl">https://riubu.ubu.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/10120</identifier><datestamp>2025-02-01T01:05:30Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10259_6688</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_5086</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_2604</setSpec><setSpec>col_10259_6689</setSpec></header><metadata><d:DIDL xmlns:d="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/did/didl.xsd">
<d:DIDLInfo>
<dcterms:created xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/dcterms.xsd">2025-01-31T11:46:58Z</dcterms:created>
</d:DIDLInfo>
<d:Item id="hdl_10259_10120">
<d:Descriptor>
<d:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8">
<dii:Identifier xmlns:dii="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS" xsi:schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/dii/dii.xsd">urn:hdl:10259/10120</dii:Identifier>
</d:Statement>
</d:Descriptor>
<d:Descriptor>
<d:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8">
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>Fijación del material protésico en la hernioplastia inguinal abierta: sutura vs. cola sintética</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Eldabe Mikhail, Adel</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Palomo Luquero, Alberto</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Reoyo Pascual, José Felipe</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Seco Gil, Juan Luis</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Hernia inguinal</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cianoacrilato</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Suturas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mallas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prótesis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inguinal hernia</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cyanoacrylate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sutures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Meshes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prosthesis</dc:subject>
<dc:description>El empleo de colas sinte´ticas se ha convertido en pra´ctica habitual en varios&#xd;
campos quiru´ rgicos. El objetivo de este estudio es comparar los resultados del pegamento y&#xd;
de la sutura convencional a corto y a medio plazo en la fijacio´n de las pro´tesis en la&#xd;
hernioplastia inguinal abierta con te´cnica de tapo´n y parche.&#xd;
Materiales y me´todos: Estudio prospectivo comparativo incluyendo 198 pacientes con diagno´ stico de hernia inguinal no recidivada intervenidos a cielo abierto y asignados de manera&#xd;
aleatoria a fijacio´n de lasmallas conpegamento de cianoacrilato (n = 101) o consutura (n = 98).&#xd;
Se analizaron las caracterı´sticas demogra´ficas, las complicaciones a corto plazo, la estancia&#xd;
postoperatoria, la baja laboral, la recidiva herniaria y la neuralgia inguinal cro´nica.&#xd;
Resultados: La morbilidad global ha sido del 13,9% en el grupo del pegamento y del 30,9% en&#xd;
el grupo de sutura. No observamos reacciones inflamatorias ni casos de migracio´n de la&#xd;
pro´tesis. La estancia postoperatoria ha sido de 14,7 h en el caso de fijacio´n con pegamento y de&#xd;
19,1 h en el caso de suturas (p &lt; 0,0001). No encontramos diferencia entre los 2 grupos en&#xd;
cuanto a dı´as de baja laboral. La morbilidad a corto plazo fue superior en el caso de fijacio´n con&#xd;
sutura (19,6vs. 10,9%).Alan˜ o, seobservo´ unarecidivaenelgrupodesutura(1%) yningunaenel&#xd;
grupo del pegamento. No obstante, la tasa de neuralgia cro´nica de intensidad moderada/&#xd;
severa fue de 2,9% en el grupo de pegamento y de 10,3% en el grupo de sutura (p = 0,03).&#xd;
Conclusio´n: El uso de cianoacrilato es seguro y efectivo en la hernioplastia inguinal abierta&#xd;
con buenos resultados a corto y medio plazo.</dc:description>
<dc:description>The use of synthetic glues has become normal practice in several surgical&#xd;
fields. The objective of this study is to compare the short and medium term results of glue&#xd;
and conventional suture in the fixation of the prosthesis in open inguinal hernia repair with&#xd;
a plug and patch technique. Materials and methods: A comparative prospective study was conducted on 198 patients with&#xd;
a diagnosis of a non-recurrent inguinal hernia subjected to open surgery and randomly&#xd;
assigned to mesh fixation with cyanoacrylate glue (n = 101) or with suture (n = 98). The&#xd;
demographic characteristics, short-term complications, hospital stay, time off work, hernia&#xd;
recurrence, and chronic inguinal neuralgia, were analysed.&#xd;
Results: The overall morbidity was 13.9% in the glue group, and 30.9% in the suture group.&#xd;
No undue inflammatory reactions or mesh migration were observed in the group. The postoperative stay was 14.7 h for the glue group, and 19.1 h in the suture group (P &lt; .0001). No&#xd;
differences were found regarding days off work. The short-term morbidity was higher in&#xd;
the suture group (19.6% vs. 10.9%). After one year, there was one recurrence in the suture&#xd;
group (1%), and none in the glue group. However, the incidence of moderate/severe&#xd;
intensity chronic neuralgia was 2.9% in the glue group, and 10.3% in the suture group&#xd;
(P = .03).&#xd;
Conclusion: The use of cyanoacrylate is safe and effective in open inguinal hernia repair,&#xd;
with good results in the short and medium term</dc:description>
<dc:date>2025-01-31T11:46:58Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2025-01-31T11:46:58Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2012-09</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>0009-739X</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10259/10120</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.1016/j.ciresp.2012.05.003</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>spa</dc:language>
<dc:relation>Cirugía Española. 2012, V. 90, n. 7, p. 446-452</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ciresp.2012.05.003</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc>
</d:Statement>
</d:Descriptor>
<d:Component id="10259_10120_1">
<d:Resource ref="https://riubu.ubu.es/bitstream/10259/10120/1/Eldabe-ce_2012.pdf" mimeType="application/pdf"/>
</d:Component>
</d:Item>
</d:DIDL></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>