2026-04-23T00:03:41Zhttps://riubu.ubu.es/oai/request

oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/109162025-10-03T00:05:33Zcom_10259_4244com_10259_5086com_10259_2604col_10259_4245

Carbon dioxide use for the enhanced production and recovery of furfural concentrates using the semi-continuous organic solvent-free biphasic subcritical water-CO2 system Illera Gigante, Alba Ester Candela Gil, Helena Beltrán Calvo, Sagrario Sanz Díez, Mª Teresa SubW-CO2 Microwave CPME Biphasic system Furfural Xylose Biomasa Biomass Furfural production from biomass and its derivate sugars has been studied over the last 100 years, but there is still room for improvement in its production process. Furfural degrades into other compounds when dissolved in water, and the use of organic solvents in biphasic systems has been extensively used to solve this problem. To avoid the use of organic solvents, a biphasic system formed by only subcritical water and carbon dioxide as reaction medium was proposed as a more sustainable approach to produce furfural from xylose. In this semi-continuous system, CO2 acts as a Brønsted catalyst by dissolving in the water phase and as a selective extracting agent for furfural, by a continuous feeding of the gas and a continuous furfural enriched gas release. CrCl3 was used as a Lewis catalyst to increase furfural yield. Best results were 46.3 % furfural yield at 50 bar after 1.5 h at 180 °C, with 13.5 % of the furfural collected through the CO2 phase at 35 g/L. Adding an organic solvent such as CPME further improved furfural production due to its lower degradation, although its combination with CO2 did not produce any further improvement. Furfural in the CO2 phase presented high purity, since CO2 can be easily removed, contrary to typical water or organic phases extractions. The semi-continuous operation of the subW-CO2 system at 50 bar was selected as the best option due to its higher furfural yield, lower degradation products production, increased furfural recovery and lower energy consumption and cost of furfural production. This work was supported by the Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI), Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MICINN) and Next Generation UE (Plan de Recuperaciónn, Transformación y Resiliencia) [grant numbers TED2021-129311B-I00 and PDC2022-133443-I00] and the Junta de Castilla y León (JCyL) and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) [grant number BU027P23]. 2025-10-02T08:24:52Z 2025-10-02T08:24:52Z 2025-08 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion 0959-6526 https://hdl.handle.net/10259/10916 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146228 eng Journal of Cleaner Production. 2025, V. 521, 146228 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146228 Atribución 4.0 Internacional http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess application/pdf Elsevier https://riubu.ubu.es/bitstream/10259/10916/4/Illera-jcp_2025.pdf.jpg Hispana TEXT http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ RIUBU. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Burgos https://hdl.handle.net/10259/10916