<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-06-10T22:07:09Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/11830" metadataPrefix="rdf">https://riubu.ubu.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/11830</identifier><datestamp>2026-06-10T00:05:39Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10259_6171</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_5086</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_2604</setSpec><setSpec>col_10259_6172</setSpec></header><metadata><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ds="http://dspace.org/ds/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:ow="http://www.ontoweb.org/ontology/1#" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd">
<ow:Publication rdf:about="oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/11830">
<dc:title>Fayalite slag and municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash as sand replacement in cement mortar: Physical, mechanical, and durability properties</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Adediran, Adeolu</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Asaam, Nana</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Manso Morato, Javier</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Avci, Erdi</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Perumal, Priyadharshini</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Fayalite slag</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bottom ash</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cement mortar</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Alkali–silica reaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Freeze-thaw</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sulfate and chloride</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Construction application</dc:subject>
<dc:description>Approximately 300,000 tons of municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash (BA) and 600,000&#xd;
tons of fayalite slag (FS) are generated annually in Finland from metallurgical and incineration&#xd;
processes, with the majority of them disposed of in landfills or used in low-value applications.&#xd;
This study investigated the potential upcycling of FS and BA as sand replacements in cementbased&#xd;
mortars to avoid landfilling, conserve natural resources, and ensure efficient use of industrial&#xd;
residues. Standard sand (SS) was used as the main fine aggregate. The effect of replacing&#xd;
SS partly or wholly with either FS or BA was investigated through workability, compressive&#xd;
strength, ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), scanning electron microscope analysis, capillary water&#xd;
absorption, alkali–silica reaction (ASR), freeze-thaw cycles in water, and combined sodium sulfate&#xd;
and sodium chloride solution exposure. The aggregates’ leaching results were below the&#xd;
values stipulated by Finnish and EU regulations. Partial or full replacement of SS with either FS or&#xd;
BA resulted in lower workability. Full replacement of SS with FS resulted in comparable properties&#xd;
to the reference mix in terms of compressive strength, UPV, and capillary water absorption.&#xd;
Meanwhile, partial replacement of SS with FS resulted in higher compressive strength and UPV&#xd;
but reduced water absorption. In contrast, partial or full replacement of SS with BA resulted in&#xd;
lower compressive strength and UPV, as well as increased water absorption compared with the&#xd;
reference mix. All samples remained stable after exposure to freeze-thaw cycles in water. However,&#xd;
only the reference samples and samples containing 50% replacement of SS with either FS or&#xd;
BA were stable after exposure to freeze-thaw cycles in a combined sulfate and chloride solution,&#xd;
whereas those containing 100% FS or BA were completely degraded. Of all the aggregates, only&#xd;
FS satisfied the 14-day ASR requirements according to the ASTM C1260 standard, achieving a low&#xd;
expansion rate of 0.009%.</dc:description>
<dc:date>2026-06-09T11:25:13Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2026-06-09T11:25:13Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2026-05</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>2352-7102</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/10259/11830</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jobe.2026.116374</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>Journal of Building Engineering. 2026, V. 127, art. 116374</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2026.116374</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>Atribución 4.0 Internacional</dc:rights>
<dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
</ow:Publication>
</rdf:RDF></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>