<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-21T09:21:26Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/4215" metadataPrefix="qdc">https://riubu.ubu.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/4215</identifier><datestamp>2021-11-02T12:03:19Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10259_4402</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_5086</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_2604</setSpec><setSpec>col_10259_4403</setSpec></header><metadata><qdc:qualifieddc xmlns:qdc="http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dcterms.xsd http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/ http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcmi/xmlschema/qualifieddc.xsd">
<dc:title>Social image of disability. Vulnerability of the dignity of women with disability and social exclusion contexts</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Gómez Monedero, José Antonio</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Unanue Cuesta, Concepción</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Núñez Angulo, Beatriz F.</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Social image</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Women with disability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>The dignity of women</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vulnerability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social exclusion</dc:subject>
<dcterms:abstract>Disability does not have nor had the same perception in all civilizations. Its treatment and considerations have been very complex&#xd;
and diverse within its regions and have generated multiple discriminatory behaviors. Today, we live in a new social paradigm&#xd;
developed with human rights in mind that people with disabilities enjoy. This new model, more human, has been adopted in most&#xd;
countries of the world. These rights are consistent with equality in opportunities thanks to the support in new policies and new&#xd;
action programs in favor of education, health, and work rights to help them enjoy their full potential.&#xd;
The rights for people with disabilities has been reinforced with the support and legislative recommendations made from the&#xd;
European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedom of 1953, from the Program of World Action&#xd;
for Disabilities (Decade of United Nations for People with Disabilities between 1983-1992), from the European Action Plan for&#xd;
People with Disabilities 2003 - 2010, Strategies about Disabilities 2010-2020 in the European Union. In Spain, with the law of&#xd;
April 7th of 1982: Law of Social Integration for the Handicapped (LISMI) and also, with the law of 51/2003, of December 2nd, of&#xd;
Equal Opportunities, no Discrimination and Universal Accessibility for People with Disabilities (LIONDAU).&#xd;
Society has come a long way which has allowed us to change from humiliating conceptualizations like: crazy, demential, disable,&#xd;
handicapped, deficient, etc., to the new concept of people with disabilities. Regardless of this improvements, reality shows the&#xd;
precariousness situation that this people live, especially, women and girls with disabilities. They have difficulties even to be able&#xd;
to read and write. They are excluded from the education system, work training and some basic health services that ignore them and&#xd;
deny their right to reproduce and deny their sexuality. Therefore, they suffer a greater social exclusion and are more vulnerable to&#xd;
violence situations for multiple discriminations: to be a woman and to have a disability. They face a social image that is invisible&#xd;
and anonymous in our society.</dcterms:abstract>
<dcterms:dateAccepted>2016-08-31T11:18:48Z</dcterms:dateAccepted>
<dcterms:available>2016-08-31T11:18:48Z</dcterms:available>
<dcterms:created>2016-08-31T11:18:48Z</dcterms:created>
<dcterms:issued>2014-12</dcterms:issued>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>1877-0428</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10259/4215</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.019</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014, V. 161, p. 115-120</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.019</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported</dc:rights>
<dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
</qdc:qualifieddc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>