<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-06-29T19:23:02Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/4294" metadataPrefix="rdf">https://riubu.ubu.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/4294</identifier><datestamp>2022-12-20T09:11:59Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10259_4292</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_5086</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_2604</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259.4_2516</setSpec><setSpec>col_10259_4293</setSpec><setSpec>col_10259.4_2517</setSpec></header><metadata><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ds="http://dspace.org/ds/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:ow="http://www.ontoweb.org/ontology/1#" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd">
<ow:Publication rdf:about="oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/4294">
<dc:title>Adaptation and Validation of QUick, Easy, New, CHEap, and Reproducible (QUENCHER) Antioxidant Capacity Assays in Model Products Obtained from Residual Wine Pomace</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Pino García, Raquel del</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>García Lomillo, Javier</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Rivero Pérez, Maria Dolores</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>González San José, Mª Luisa</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Muñiz Rodríguez, Pilar</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>antioxidant activities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>ABTS</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Folin−Ciocalteu</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>free radical scavenging assays</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>cellulose</dc:subject>
<dc:description>Evaluation of the total antioxidant capacity of solid matrices without extraction steps is a very interesting&#xd;
alternative for food researchers and also for food industries. These methodologies have been denominated QUENCHER from&#xd;
QUick, Easy, New, CHEap, and Reproducible assays. To demonstrate and highlight the validity of QUENCHER (Q) methods,&#xd;
values of Q-method validation were showed for the first time, and they were tested with products of well-known different&#xd;
chemical properties. Furthermore, new QUENCHER assays to measure scavenging capacity against superoxide, hydroxyl, and&#xd;
lipid peroxyl radicals were developed. Calibration models showed good linearity (R2 > 0.995), proportionality and precision (CV&#xd;
&lt; 6.5%), and acceptable detection limits (&lt;20.4 nmol Trolox equiv). The presence of ethanol in the reaction medium gave&#xd;
antioxidant capacity values significantly different from those obtained with water. The dilution of samples with powdered&#xd;
cellulose was discouraged because possible interferences with some of the matrices analyzed may take place.</dc:description>
<dc:date>2016-12-12T11:03:58Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2016-12-12T11:03:58Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2015-08</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>0021-8561</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10259/4294</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2015, V. 63, n. 31, p. 6835-7094</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf5042678</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:publisher>American Chemical Society</dc:publisher>
</ow:Publication>
</rdf:RDF></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>