<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-17T04:47:21Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/4351" metadataPrefix="marc">https://riubu.ubu.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/4351</identifier><datestamp>2022-04-29T12:02:45Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10259_4219</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_5086</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_2604</setSpec><setSpec>col_10259_4220</setSpec></header><metadata><record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<leader>00925njm 22002777a 4500</leader>
<datafield tag="042" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">dc</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="720" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Kuncheva, Ludmila I. .</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="720" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Rodríguez Diez, Juan José</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="720" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Jackson, Aaron S. .</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="c">2017-03</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">We consider a problem where a set X of N objects (instances) coming from c classes have to be classified simultaneously. A restriction is imposed on X in that the maximum possible number of objects from each class is known, hence we dubbed the problem who-is-there? We compare three approaches to this problem: (1) independent classification whereby each object is labelled in the class with the largest posterior probability; (2) a greedy approach which enforces the restriction; and (3) a theoretical approach which, in addition, maximises the likelihood of the label assignment, implemented through the Hungarian assignment algorithm. Our experimental study consists of two parts. The first part includes a custom-made chess data set where the pieces on the chess board must be recognised together from an image of the board. In the second part, we simulate the restricted set classification scenario using 96 datasets from a recently collated repository (University of Santiago de Compostela, USC). Our results show that the proposed approach (3) outperforms approaches (1) and (2).</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="024" ind2=" " ind1="8">
<subfield code="a">0031-3203</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="024" ind2=" " ind1="8">
<subfield code="a">http://hdl.handle.net/10259/4351</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Pattern recognition</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Object classification</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Restricted set classification</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Compound decision problem</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Chess pieces classification</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
<subfield code="a">Restricted set classification: Who is there?</subfield>
</datafield>
</record></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>