<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-23T03:28:52Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/4370" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://riubu.ubu.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/4370</identifier><datestamp>2022-04-29T12:02:47Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10259_4354</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_5086</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_2604</setSpec><setSpec>col_10259_4355</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>From food defence to food supply chain integrity</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Davidson, Rebecca K.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Antunes, Wilson .</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Madslien, Elisabeth H.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Belenguer, José</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Gerevini, Marco</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Torroba Pérez, Tomás</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Prugger, Raffaello</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Food safety</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Food security</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fraud</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Terrorism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Food defence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public perception</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Chemistry, Organic</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Química orgánica</dc:subject>
<dc:description>Purpose – Consumer confidence in the European food industry has been shaken by a number of recent&#xd;
scandals due to food fraud and accidental contamination, reminding the authors that deliberate incidents can&#xd;
occur. Food defence methods aim to prevent or mitigate deliberate attacks on the food supply chain but are&#xd;
not a legal requirement. The purpose of this paper is to discuss how proactive and reactive food defence&#xd;
practices can help prevent or mitigate malicious attacks on the food chain and also food fraud, food crime and&#xd;
food safety. The authors look at how food defence differs from food safety and how it contributes to food&#xd;
supply chain integrity.&#xd;
Design/methodology/approach – Food defence has been the focus of two different EU FP7 security&#xd;
projects, EDEN and SNIFFER. Food industry stakeholders participated in workshops and demonstrations on&#xd;
food defence and relevant technology was tested in different food production scenarios.&#xd;
Findings – Food industry end-users reported a lack of knowledge regarding food defence practices. They&#xd;
wished for further guidelines and training on risk assessment as well as access to validated test methods.&#xd;
Novel detection tools and methods showed promise with authentication, identification, measurement,&#xd;
assessment and control at multiple levels of the food supply chain prior to distribution and retail.&#xd;
Practical implications – The prevention of a contamination incident, prior to retail, costs less than dealing&#xd;
with a large foodborne disease outbreak. Food defence should therefore be integral to food supply chain&#xd;
integrity and not just an afterthought in the wake of an incident.&#xd;
Originality/value – It is argued that food defence practices have a vital role to play across the board in&#xd;
unintentional and intentional food contamination incidents. The application of these methods can help ensure&#xd;
food supply chain integrity.</dc:description>
<dc:description>European Union (EU) Seventh Framework Programme&#xd;
projects (FP7/2007-2013): EDEN: End-User Driven Demo for CBRNe, under Grant&#xd;
61&#xd;
Food supply&#xd;
chain integrity&#xd;
Downloaded by UNIVERSIDAD DE BURGOS At 07:57 06 January 2017 (PT)&#xd;
Agreement no. 313077, and SNIFFER: Sensory devices network for food supply chain&#xd;
security, under Grant Agreement no. 312411.</dc:description>
<dc:date>2017-03-15T11:58:02Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2019-01-01T03:45:06Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2017</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10259/4370</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>British Food Journal. 2017, V. 119, n. 1, p. 52-66</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-04-2016-0138</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/312411</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:publisher>Emerald</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>