<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-29T20:44:33Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/4689" metadataPrefix="didl">https://riubu.ubu.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/4689</identifier><datestamp>2021-11-02T12:03:58Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10259_4145</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_5086</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_2604</setSpec><setSpec>col_10259_4678</setSpec></header><metadata><d:DIDL xmlns:d="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/did/didl.xsd">
<d:DIDLInfo>
<dcterms:created xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/dcterms.xsd">2017-11-30T09:34:35Z</dcterms:created>
</d:DIDLInfo>
<d:Item id="hdl_10259_4689">
<d:Descriptor>
<d:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8">
<dii:Identifier xmlns:dii="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS" xsi:schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/dii/dii.xsd">urn:hdl:10259/4689</dii:Identifier>
</d:Statement>
</d:Descriptor>
<d:Descriptor>
<d:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8">
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>Responsible research and innovation: an opportunity to reframing science (and technological) education?</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Edwards-Schachter, Mónica</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Greca Dufranc, Ileana María</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Responsible Research and Innovation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Responsible citizenship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Relevance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nature of Science</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology and Innovation (NoSTI)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>literacies</dc:subject>
<dc:description>Trabajo presentado en: ESERA 2017: 12th Conference of the European Science Education Research Association, 21-25 de agosto de 2017, Dublin</dc:description>
<dc:description>The term Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) is gaining currency across Europe and worldwide&#xd;
aiming a better alignment between responsiveness and governance of scientific knowledge production,&#xd;
innovation and citizen participation facing current grand challenges we are living. This broad and complex&#xd;
purpose has been simplified with a normative framework involving six dimensions labeled as public&#xd;
engagement in research and innovation, science literacy and scientific education, gender equality, open&#xd;
access to scientific knowledge, research results and data, governance and ethics. This paper analyses the&#xd;
rationale and ways by which RRI is being introduced in science education field, including 13 projects&#xd;
developed in both formal and informal education. We apply a heuristic approach building on an extensive&#xd;
literature review focusing on Relevance and Responsible Science Education (RSE) and the recent&#xd;
framework proposed by Stilgoe et al. (2013), which comprises the principles of anticipation, reflexivity,&#xd;
inclusion and responsiveness. Our findings show a limited advance in both the understanding and benefits in&#xd;
the implementation of RRI and the existence of fragmented initiatives where the concept remains&#xd;
underdeveloped. The uncritical implementation of RRI and the emphasis in ‘responsibility’ linked to&#xd;
research contrasts with the scarce knowledge of what innovation and ‘responsible innovation’ mean and&#xd;
could contribute to increase imbalances rather than overcoming current barriers in science education. They&#xd;
also reveal the opportunity to open up the debate on a number of aspects ignored or barely considered to&#xd;
date and provide some suggestions for new research avenues in the science education field. In particular,&#xd;
we propose to broaden the inter-disciplinary studies towards comprehensive scopes on the Nature of&#xd;
Science, Technology and Innovation (NoSTI).</dc:description>
<dc:date>2017-11-30T09:34:35Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2017-11-30T09:34:35Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2017</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10259/4689</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
</d:Statement>
</d:Descriptor>
<d:Component id="10259_4689_1">
<d:Resource ref="https://riubu.ubu.es/bitstream/10259/4689/1/Edwards-Schachter-Responsible%20research%20and%20innovation.pdf" mimeType="application/pdf"/>
</d:Component>
</d:Item>
</d:DIDL></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>