<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-17T07:29:58Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/4749" metadataPrefix="marc">https://riubu.ubu.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/4749</identifier><datestamp>2022-04-29T12:02:45Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10259_4219</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_5086</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_2604</setSpec><setSpec>col_10259_4220</setSpec></header><metadata><record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<leader>00925njm 22002777a 4500</leader>
<datafield tag="042" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">dc</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="720" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Faithfull, William J. .</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="720" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Rodríguez Diez, Juan José</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="720" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Kuncheva, Ludmila I. .</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="c">2019-01</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Detecting change in multivariate data is a challenging problem, especially when class labels are not available. There is a large body of research on univariate change detection, notably in control charts developed originally for engineering applications. We evaluate univariate change detection approaches —including those in the MOA framework — built into ensembles where each member observes a feature in the input space of an unsupervised change detection problem. We present a comparison between the ensemble combinations and three established ‘pure’ multivariate approaches over 96 data sets, and a case study on the KDD Cup 1999 network intrusion detection dataset. We found that ensemble combination of univariate methods consistently outperformed multivariate methods on the four experimental metrics.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="024" ind2=" " ind1="8">
<subfield code="a">1566-2535</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="024" ind2=" " ind1="8">
<subfield code="a">http://hdl.handle.net/10259/4749</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="024" ind2=" " ind1="8">
<subfield code="a">10.1016/j.inffus.2018.02.003</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
<subfield code="a">Combining univariate approaches for ensemble change detection in multivariate data</subfield>
</datafield>
</record></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>