<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-18T21:38:01Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/5324" metadataPrefix="etdms">https://riubu.ubu.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/5324</identifier><datestamp>2022-04-07T10:28:20Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10259_4734</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_5086</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_2604</setSpec><setSpec>col_10259_4735</setSpec></header><metadata><thesis xmlns="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/etdms.xsd">
<title>Evaluability assessment of a community development leisure program in Spain</title>
<creator>Hortigüela Arroyo, María</creator>
<creator>Ubillos Landa, Silvia</creator>
<subject>Evaluability assessment</subject>
<subject>Public program evaluation</subject>
<subject>Community development</subject>
<subject>Program improvement</subject>
<description>This paper presents the results of an evaluability assessment (EA) conducted in Spain. EAs are assessments that minimize the uncertainty and risk inherent in a subsequent evaluation (e.g. an impact or results assessment) that may require excessive resources. We designed our own EA model by combining three theoretical approaches, with a holistic and pedagogic vision of the process and a flexible methodology to enable adaptation to different programs and contexts, thus fostering transferability. The EA was carried using a qualitative methodology: documentary analysis, seven semi-structured interviews with stakeholders, eight direct observation sessions and a check-list for politicians and experts. The outcome report helped promote organizational learning, provided the program with a logical and assessable theoretical model, detected its strengths and helped overcome the barriers to efficient assessment. Based on these achievements, an evaluation of the results was recommended, with repeated pretest-posttest measurements and an equivalent control group.</description>
<date>2020-06-03</date>
<date>2020-06-03</date>
<date>2019-02</date>
<type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</type>
<identifier>0149-7189</identifier>
<identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10259/5324</identifier>
<identifier>10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.10.014</identifier>
<language>eng</language>
<relation>Evaluation and Program Planning. 2019. V. 72, p. 219-226</relation>
<relation>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.10.014</relation>
<rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</rights>
<rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights>
<rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional</rights>
<publisher>Elsevier</publisher>
</thesis></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>