<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-18T21:39:38Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/5324" metadataPrefix="marc">https://riubu.ubu.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/5324</identifier><datestamp>2022-04-07T10:28:20Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10259_4734</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_5086</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_2604</setSpec><setSpec>col_10259_4735</setSpec></header><metadata><record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<leader>00925njm 22002777a 4500</leader>
<datafield tag="042" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">dc</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="720" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Hortigüela Arroyo, María</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="720" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Ubillos Landa, Silvia</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="c">2019-02</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">This paper presents the results of an evaluability assessment (EA) conducted in Spain. EAs are assessments that minimize the uncertainty and risk inherent in a subsequent evaluation (e.g. an impact or results assessment) that may require excessive resources. We designed our own EA model by combining three theoretical approaches, with a holistic and pedagogic vision of the process and a flexible methodology to enable adaptation to different programs and contexts, thus fostering transferability. The EA was carried using a qualitative methodology: documentary analysis, seven semi-structured interviews with stakeholders, eight direct observation sessions and a check-list for politicians and experts. The outcome report helped promote organizational learning, provided the program with a logical and assessable theoretical model, detected its strengths and helped overcome the barriers to efficient assessment. Based on these achievements, an evaluation of the results was recommended, with repeated pretest-posttest measurements and an equivalent control group.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="024" ind2=" " ind1="8">
<subfield code="a">0149-7189</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="024" ind2=" " ind1="8">
<subfield code="a">http://hdl.handle.net/10259/5324</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="024" ind2=" " ind1="8">
<subfield code="a">10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.10.014</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Evaluability assessment</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Public program evaluation</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Community development</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Program improvement</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
<subfield code="a">Evaluability assessment of a community development leisure program in Spain</subfield>
</datafield>
</record></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>