<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-18T21:37:26Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/5324" metadataPrefix="mods">https://riubu.ubu.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/5324</identifier><datestamp>2022-04-07T10:28:20Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10259_4734</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_5086</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_2604</setSpec><setSpec>col_10259_4735</setSpec></header><metadata><mods:mods xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
<mods:name>
<mods:namePart>Hortigüela Arroyo, María</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:namePart>Ubillos Landa, Silvia</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:extension>
<mods:dateAvailable encoding="iso8601">2020-06-03T11:31:45Z</mods:dateAvailable>
</mods:extension>
<mods:extension>
<mods:dateAccessioned encoding="iso8601">2020-06-03T11:31:45Z</mods:dateAccessioned>
</mods:extension>
<mods:originInfo>
<mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">2019-02</mods:dateIssued>
</mods:originInfo>
<mods:identifier type="issn">0149-7189</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/10259/5324</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="doi">10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.10.014</mods:identifier>
<mods:abstract>This paper presents the results of an evaluability assessment (EA) conducted in Spain. EAs are assessments that minimize the uncertainty and risk inherent in a subsequent evaluation (e.g. an impact or results assessment) that may require excessive resources. We designed our own EA model by combining three theoretical approaches, with a holistic and pedagogic vision of the process and a flexible methodology to enable adaptation to different programs and contexts, thus fostering transferability. The EA was carried using a qualitative methodology: documentary analysis, seven semi-structured interviews with stakeholders, eight direct observation sessions and a check-list for politicians and experts. The outcome report helped promote organizational learning, provided the program with a logical and assessable theoretical model, detected its strengths and helped overcome the barriers to efficient assessment. Based on these achievements, an evaluation of the results was recommended, with repeated pretest-posttest measurements and an equivalent control group.</mods:abstract>
<mods:language>
<mods:languageTerm>eng</mods:languageTerm>
</mods:language>
<mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</mods:accessCondition>
<mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</mods:accessCondition>
<mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional</mods:accessCondition>
<mods:subject>
<mods:topic>Evaluability assessment</mods:topic>
</mods:subject>
<mods:subject>
<mods:topic>Public program evaluation</mods:topic>
</mods:subject>
<mods:subject>
<mods:topic>Community development</mods:topic>
</mods:subject>
<mods:subject>
<mods:topic>Program improvement</mods:topic>
</mods:subject>
<mods:titleInfo>
<mods:title>Evaluability assessment of a community development leisure program in Spain</mods:title>
</mods:titleInfo>
<mods:genre>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</mods:genre>
</mods:mods></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>