<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-05-07T22:21:11Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/6109" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://riubu.ubu.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/6109</identifier><datestamp>2022-12-19T09:49:15Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10259.4_2560</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_5086</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_2604</setSpec><setSpec>col_10259.4_2561</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>Analysing non-coaxial folding effects in the Small Circle Intersection method</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Calvín Ballester, Pablo</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Pueyo Morer, Emilio L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Ramón Ortiga, Mª José</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Casas Sainz, Antonio M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Villalaín Santamaria, Juan José</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Palaeomagnetism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Remagnetization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Magnetismo</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Geología</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Magnetism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Geology</dc:subject>
<dc:description>The Small Circle (SC) tools analyse the stereographic tracks (small circles) followed by the&#xd;
palaeomagnetic vectors during folding processes. Working with interfolding and synfolding&#xd;
remagnetizations, the Small Circle Intersection (SCI) method allows finding the best solution&#xd;
of grouping that should correspond with the remagnetization direction. Once this is known,&#xd;
it is possible to determine the magnetization age as well as the degree of bed tilting at this&#xd;
moment. The SC tools are based on some assumptions, among which the coaxiality between&#xd;
the different deformation events is the one addressed in this work (i.e. absence of vertical&#xd;
axis rotations, VARs, or differential horizontal axis rotations, dHARs). This assumption is&#xd;
based on the necessity of knowing the rotation axis for folding after the acquisition of the&#xd;
remagnetization, and SC tools consider the bedding strike as this axis, something that is&#xd;
only accomplished under coaxial folding. In order to explore how non-coaxiality affects the&#xd;
solutions derived from the SC methods, we first (i) identify the variables that control these&#xd;
errors through simple models that only consider two theoretical palaeomagnetic sites, after&#xd;
that it is possible (ii) to derive the mathematical relationships between them. Finally, we (iii)&#xd;
simulate errors derived from the use of SC tools using a population of 30 palaeomagnetic sites&#xd;
recreating different possible scenarios with VARs and dHARs in nature.</dc:description>
<dc:description>Research financed by the projects&#xd;
DR3AM- CGL2014-55118 and CGL2016-77560-C2 from the&#xd;
Spanish Ministry of Science (MINECO) and by the Applied Geology&#xd;
(GeoAP-E0117R) and Geotransfer groups of the Government&#xd;
of Aragon, as well as by the project BU235P18 (Junta de&#xd;
Castilla y Leon, Spain) and the European Regional Development&#xd;
Fund (ERD). It has also benefited from the MAGIBER-II network&#xd;
(CGL2017-90632-REDT) funded by the Ministry of Science, Innovation&#xd;
and Universities.</dc:description>
<dc:date>2021-11-05T09:14:38Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2021-11-05T09:14:38Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2020-08</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>0956-540X</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10259/6109</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.1093/gji/ggaa217</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>Geophysical Journal International. 2020, V. 222, n. 2, p. 940–955</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa217</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//CGL2014-55118</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2013-2016/CGL2016-77560-C2-1-P/ES/La remagnetización cretacica del alto Atlas Central como herramienta de reconstrucción geométrica de la estructura Pre-cenozoica</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/Junta de Castilla y León//BU235P18//Análisis arqueomagnéticos en materiales arqueológicos quemados de edad holocena y pleistocena</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2013-2016/CGL2017-90632-REDT</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>