2026-04-20T22:50:14Zhttps://riubu.ubu.es/oai/request

oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/76532024-05-20T09:42:54Zcom_10259_4204com_10259_5086com_10259_2604col_10259_5373

Pérez Acebo, Heriberto Ziolkowski, Robert Linares Unamunzaga, Alaitz Gonzalo Orden, Hernán 2023-04-20T12:10:32Z 2023-04-20T12:10:32Z 2020-05 http://hdl.handle.net/10259/7653 10.3390/app10103368 2076-3417 Traffic calming measures (TCM) are placed in urban areas to improve road safety, and among them, vertical TCMs are widely employed. Many researches are focused on the influence of the geometry of each measure on speed reduction, but it is demonstrated that drivers forget its effect and speed up after it. Therefore, placing consecutive TCMs can help to maintain a safe area. However, scarce literature can be found about the adequate spacing between them. Hence, the aim of this paper is to analyze the adequate distance between TCMs. Various streets with variable distances and different vertical TCMs were evaluated in Poland and Spain, including raised crosswalks, raised intersections, speed humps and speed cushions. The intermediate point between two TCMs was selected as the place where the maximum speed is achieved. Results showed that there was a good correlation between the speeds at intermediate points and the distance between TCMs, with a determination coefficient around 0.80. For an 85th percentile of the speed under 50 km/h, a maximum distance of 200 m between TCMs is recommended, and for a value of 40 km/h, 75 m. eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Atribución 4.0 Internacional Traffic calming measure Spacing Speed prediction Speed humps Raised crosswalk Raised intersection Speed cushion Road safety Urban area A Series of Vertical Deflections, a Promising Traffic Calming Measure: Analysis and Recommendations for Spacing info:eu-repo/semantics/article