2026-04-18T21:36:55Zhttps://riubu.ubu.es/oai/request

oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/87952024-03-12T01:05:27Zcom_10259_3725com_10259_5086com_10259_2604com_10259_4141com_10259_6688com_10259_4219col_10259_3726col_10259_4142col_10259_6689col_10259_4220

González Santos, Josefa González Bernal, Jerónimo Fuente Anuncibay, Raquel de la Soto Cámara, Raúl Cubo Delgado, Esther Aguilar-Parra, José M. Trigueros Ramos, Rubén López Liria, Remedios 2024-03-11T10:48:30Z 2024-03-11T10:48:30Z 2020-04 http://hdl.handle.net/10259/8795 10.3390/ijerph17072612 1660-4601 Objective: To compare cranial helmet therapy (CHT) and physiotherapy (PT) for the effective treatment of positional plagiocephaly in infants in terms of improving functional recovery. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study involving 48 infants between 5–10 months of age with cranial deformities. The Cranial Vault Asymmetry Index (CVAI) and the Brunet–Lezine scale were calculated at the initiation of the study and after 40 treatment sessions. Results: The infants’ first assessment showed a delay in overall development areas with a global developmental quotient (DQ) (posture, coordination, sociability, and language) of 80.15. Although developmental improvements were observed in both groups in the Brunet–Lezine scale after treatment, the MANCOVA test showed no significant differences (F(5) = 0.82, p = 0.506, eta2 = 0.09). The CVAI reduced to 4.07% during the final evaluation in the cranial helmet group and 5.85% in the physiotherapy group without any significant differences between the two therapies (p = 0.70). Conclusions: No statistically significant differences were found between CHT and PT. After treatment, improvements from baseline measurements were observed in each of the readings of cranial deformity. eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Atribución 4.0 Internacional Plagiocephaly Helmet Physiotherapy Intervention Treatment Infant Cranial Deformity: Cranial Helmet Therapy or Physiotherapy? info:eu-repo/semantics/article