<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-27T11:47:59Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/10143" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://riubu.ubu.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/10143</identifier><datestamp>2025-02-01T01:05:31Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10259_4145</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_5086</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_2604</setSpec><setSpec>col_10259_4146</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>Perceived Difficulty of School Science and Cost Appraisals: a Valuable Relationship for the STEM Pipeline?</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Toma, Radu Bogdan</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Expectancy-value</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Loss of valued alternatives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Task effort</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Perceived difficulty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psicología</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enseñanza</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching</dc:subject>
<dc:description>The lack of students interested in pursuing science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)-related careers calls for studies that identify variables affecting their career decisions. By drawing on recent conceptualizations of the cost domain first introduced in the expectancy-value theory of achievement motivations, this study investigated whether the perceived difficulty of school science predicted and affected elementary school students (N = 245) task effort and loss of valued alternatives experienced while engaging in a science-related course. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis revealed that students’ perceived difficulty significantly predicted levels of cost experienced when studying science. Likewise, multi-factor ANOVAs revealed that students perceiving school science as a difficult subject reported significantly higher levels of task effort and loss of valued alternatives related to studying science. These findings suggest that the attitudinal dimensions of perceived difficulty play a promising role in the development of cost in science, which has valuable implications for repairing the leaky STEM pipeline.</dc:description>
<dc:description>This investigation was conducted under the Ph.D. research fellowship Resolución de 19 de mayo de 2017 del Vicerrector de Investigación y Transferencia del Conocimiento para financiar contratos predoctorales de la Universidad de Burgos [Resolution of 19 May 2017 of the Vice-Rector for Research and Knowledge Transfer to finance Ph.D. research fellowships at the University of Burgos], granted to the author of this study.</dc:description>
<dc:date>2025-01-31T17:08:42Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2025-01-31T17:08:42Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2022-04</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>0157-244X</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10259/10143</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.1007/s11165-020-09963-5</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>1573-1898</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>Research in Science Education. 2022, V. 52, n. 2, p. 553–565</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09963-5</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:publisher>Springer</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>