2026-07-18T12:47:51Zhttps://riubu.ubu.es/oai/request

oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/110522025-11-14T01:05:34Zcom_10259.4_2551com_10259_5086com_10259_2604col_10259.4_2552

Zorrilla Revilla, Guillermo Prado‐Nóvoa, Olalla Davy, Kevin P. García González, Rebeca Laskaridou, Eleni Howard, Kristen R. Marinik, Elaina L. Carretero Díaz, José Miguel Volpe, Stella L. 2025-11-13T09:24:38Z 2025-11-13T09:24:38Z 2025-11 2692-7691 https://hdl.handle.net/10259/11052 10.1002/ajpa.70152 2692-7691 Objectives: Locomotion is fundamental to the survival of our species. The most comfortable walking speed may be the most efficient for allocating conserved energy for other functions. However, whether preferred (PLS) and optimal (OLS) speeds align in children and adolescents remains unclear. This study aimed to determine whether OLS and PLS are similar in children and adolescents and how anthropometry influences both speeds and their differences. Materials and Methods: Eleven females and 17 males (8–17 years of age) were anthropometrically characterized. Five treadmill walking pace tests were used to identify the OLS and U-shaped relationship between energy expenditure and speed (χ2 CoT), indicating walking flexibility. Additionally, PLS was self-selected using the same protocol. Differences between OLS and PLS were calculated (mean difference [MD]). Results: No significant sex differences in anthropometry and speed-related variables were found. OLS, PLS, and their MD in the pooled sample were 3.05 ± 0.13, 2.46 ± 0.51, and 0.60 ± 0.46, respectively, with significant differences between OLS and PLS (p < 0.0001). Femur length (FL), Bi-iliac breadth (BIL), and χ2 CoT explained variance in OLS, PLS, and MD, respectively, in the forward stepwise regression models. Discussion: Unlike adults, OLS and PLS are not interchangeable in children and adolescents. Participants with lower χ2 CoT (greater flexibility) can select comfortable speeds farther from OLS without energetic penalty. Taller individuals with longer femurs and wider hips might have biomechanical advantages in reaching higher OLS and PLS, but this reduces flexibility. These traits, along with the growth and development pattern of Homo sapiens, may reflect evolutionary advantages relevant to interspecies competition. G.Z.R. benefited from Margarita Salas's postdoctoral grants program funded by the Spanish Ministry of Universities and the European Union - Next Generation EU and FSE+ [JDC2023-051295-I] funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033. O.P.N. was funded by a Virginia Tech Presidential Postdoctoral Fellowship (2022-2024). K.H.R. was funded by a Virginia Tech Translational Obesity Research Interdisciplinary Graduate Education Program Predoctoral Fellowship. application/pdf eng Wiley American Journal of Biological Anthropology. 2025, V. 188, n. 3, e70152 https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.70152 info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica, Técnica y de Innovación 2021-2023/JDC2023-051295-I/ES/Ayudas Juan de la Cierva-GUILLERMO ZORRILLA REVILLA/ Atribución 4.0 Internacional http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Anthropometry Children Human behavioral ecology Human bioenergetics Hunter-gatherers Optimal locomotion speed Locomoción Biomecánica Human locomotion Human mechanics Morphological Influences and Energetic Walking Flexibility in Determining Preferred vs. Optimal Speeds: An Evolutionary Human Ecology Perspective on Children and Adolescents info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion American Journal of Biological Anthropology 188 3