<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-07-09T04:06:35Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/11757" metadataPrefix="etdms">https://riubu.ubu.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/11757</identifier><datestamp>2026-05-30T00:05:34Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10259_3725</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_5086</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_2604</setSpec><setSpec>col_10259_3726</setSpec></header><metadata><thesis xmlns="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/etdms.xsd">
<title>Functional Outcomes in Upper Limb Replantation—A Systematic Review</title>
<creator>Bueno, Andrea</creator>
<creator>Nevado Sánchez, Endika</creator>
<creator>Collazo Riobó, Carla</creator>
<creator>Fuente Anuncibay, Raquel de la</creator>
<creator>González Bernal, Jerónimo</creator>
<subject>Replantation</subject>
<subject>Upper limb</subject>
<subject>Functionality</subject>
<description>Functionality after upper limb replantation is a decisive factor when considering the&#xd;
success of the intervention. Therefore, its evaluation is fundamental. The aim of this article was to&#xd;
conduct a systematic review of upper limb functions after replantation or reimplantation, seeking&#xd;
to identify reported functional outcomes as well as the level and mechanism of injury. To achieve&#xd;
this objective, a literature search was conducted in PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane and Web of&#xd;
Science. Studies from the last 10 years which included patients with upper limb replantation and&#xd;
reported their functional outcomes were included. Out of 523 articles, 12 studies (n = 607) were&#xd;
finally included. DASH and CISS were the most commonly used assessments to report functional&#xd;
outcomes. In conclusion, functional outcomes after replantation are assessed using widely varying&#xd;
scales; therefore, due to this methodological variability, it is difficult to compare functional success&#xd;
between studies and further studies on functionality are needed to provide new data.</description>
<date>2026-05-29</date>
<date>2026-05-29</date>
<date>2024-02</date>
<type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</type>
<identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/10259/11757</identifier>
<identifier>10.3390/JCM13051289</identifier>
<identifier>2077-0383</identifier>
<language>eng</language>
<relation>Journal of Clinical Medecine., V. 13, n. 5, art. 1289</relation>
<relation>https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13051289</relation>
<rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</rights>
<rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights>
<rights>Atribución 4.0 Internacional</rights>
<publisher>MDPI</publisher>
</thesis></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>