<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-07-20T01:17:27Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/3928" metadataPrefix="etdms">https://riubu.ubu.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/3928</identifier><datestamp>2024-05-13T07:56:35Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10259_3830</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_5086</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_2604</setSpec><setSpec>col_10259_3832</setSpec></header><metadata><thesis xmlns="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/etdms.xsd">
<title>Direct quality prediction in resistance spot welding process: Sensitivity, specificity and predictive accuracy comparative analysis</title>
<creator>Pereda, María</creator>
<creator>Santos Martín, José Ignacio</creator>
<creator>Martín, Óscar</creator>
<creator>Galán Ordax, José Manuel</creator>
<subject>Resistance spot welding</subject>
<subject>Classification</subject>
<subject>Pattern recognition</subject>
<subject>Quality control</subject>
<subject>Support vector machines</subject>
<subject>Random forest</subject>
<subject>Artificial neural networks</subject>
<description>In this work, several of the most popular and state-of-the-art classification methods are compared as pattern recognition tools for classification&#xd;
of resistance spot welding joints. Instead of using the result of a non-destructive&#xd;
testing technique as input variables, classifiers are trained directly with the&#xd;
relevant welding parameters, i.e. welding current, welding time and the type of&#xd;
electrode (electrode material and treatment). The algorithms are compared in&#xd;
terms of accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC)&#xd;
curve metrics, using nested cross-validation. Results show that although there is not a dominant classifier for every specificity/sensitivity requirement, support vector machines using radial kernel, boosting and random forest techniques obtain the best performance overall</description>
<date>2016-02-12</date>
<date>2016-02-12</date>
<date>2015-11</date>
<type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</type>
<identifier>1362-1718</identifier>
<identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10259/3928</identifier>
<identifier>10.1179/1362171815Y.0000000052</identifier>
<language>eng</language>
<relation>Science and technology of welding and joining. 2015, V. 20, n. 8, p. 679-685</relation>
<relation>http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1179/1362171815Y.0000000052</relation>
<relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN/CSD2010-00034</relation>
<relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/JCyL/GREX251-2009</relation>
<rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights>
<publisher>Maney Publishing</publisher>
</thesis></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>