<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-07-19T23:01:57Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/3928" metadataPrefix="qdc">https://riubu.ubu.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/3928</identifier><datestamp>2024-05-13T07:56:35Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10259_3830</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_5086</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_2604</setSpec><setSpec>col_10259_3832</setSpec></header><metadata><qdc:qualifieddc xmlns:qdc="http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dcterms.xsd http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/ http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcmi/xmlschema/qualifieddc.xsd">
<dc:title>Direct quality prediction in resistance spot welding process: Sensitivity, specificity and predictive accuracy comparative analysis</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Pereda, María</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Santos Martín, José Ignacio</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Martín, Óscar</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Galán Ordax, José Manuel</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Resistance spot welding</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pattern recognition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Quality control</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Support vector machines</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Random forest</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Artificial neural networks</dc:subject>
<dcterms:abstract>In this work, several of the most popular and state-of-the-art classification methods are compared as pattern recognition tools for classification&#xd;
of resistance spot welding joints. Instead of using the result of a non-destructive&#xd;
testing technique as input variables, classifiers are trained directly with the&#xd;
relevant welding parameters, i.e. welding current, welding time and the type of&#xd;
electrode (electrode material and treatment). The algorithms are compared in&#xd;
terms of accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC)&#xd;
curve metrics, using nested cross-validation. Results show that although there is not a dominant classifier for every specificity/sensitivity requirement, support vector machines using radial kernel, boosting and random forest techniques obtain the best performance overall</dcterms:abstract>
<dcterms:dateAccepted>2016-02-12T12:38:23Z</dcterms:dateAccepted>
<dcterms:available>2016-02-12T12:38:23Z</dcterms:available>
<dcterms:created>2016-02-12T12:38:23Z</dcterms:created>
<dcterms:issued>2015-11</dcterms:issued>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>1362-1718</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10259/3928</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.1179/1362171815Y.0000000052</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>Science and technology of welding and joining. 2015, V. 20, n. 8, p. 679-685</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1179/1362171815Y.0000000052</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN/CSD2010-00034</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/JCyL/GREX251-2009</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:publisher>Maney Publishing</dc:publisher>
</qdc:qualifieddc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>