2026-06-21T17:59:28Zhttps://riubu.ubu.es/oai/requestoai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/45832022-04-20T12:51:06Zcom_10259_4244com_10259_5086com_10259_2604col_10259_4569
Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Burgos
author
García Solaesa, Ángela
author
Melgosa Gómez, Rodrigo
author
Sanz Díez, Mª Teresa
author
Beltrán Calvo, Sagrario
author
Illera Gigante, Alba Ester
2017-09-05T10:23:28Z
2017-09-05T10:23:28Z
2017
http://hdl.handle.net/10259/4583
The efficiency of lipase catalyzed glycerolysis of sardine oil in solvent free and supercritical
carbon dioxide media has been investigated. The immiscibility between substrates, glycerol
and oil, is an important drawback to reach good high conversions of triglycerides (TAG) into
monoglycerides (MAG) and diglycerides (DAG) in short reaction times. To improve mass
transfer rates, emulsification of both reactants as reverse micelles (glycerol-in-oil) has been
carried out. Enzyme-catalyzed reaction is an attractive alternative since the reaction can be
carried out under mild conditions avoiding the oxidation of omega-3 fatty acids. In this work,
a commercial immobilized lipase (Lipozyme 435) was employed as biocatalyst. The effects of
SC-CO2 density on reaction rates and oxidation stability has been compared with those
obtained in solvent free system at atmospheric pressure. The effect of temperature and
pressure on reaction yield, oxidation state of reaction products and enzyme stability was
studied. Good stability of Lipozyme 435 has been observed in both systems proving no
thermal deactivation at temperatures higher than its optimum.
eng
Comparison of glycerolysis of sardine oil by Lipozyme 435 in solvent free and SC-CO2 media
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
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
URL
https://riubu.ubu.es/bitstream/10259/4583/1/Garc%c3%ada-Comparison_of_glycerolysis.pdf
File
MD5
5100d721411a9c249ef4cd36f1eea4b8
494458
application/pdf
García-Comparison_of_glycerolysis.pdf
URL
https://riubu.ubu.es/bitstream/10259/4583/3/Garc%c3%ada-Comparison_of_glycerolysis.pdf.txt
File
MD5
aacaf31059b10dd8492ad8fec49f5ea2
18948
text/plain
García-Comparison_of_glycerolysis.pdf.txt