<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-27T14:11:11Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/4586" metadataPrefix="didl">https://riubu.ubu.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/4586</identifier><datestamp>2022-04-29T12:02:48Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10259.4_2560</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_5086</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_2604</setSpec><setSpec>col_10259.4_2561</setSpec></header><metadata><d:DIDL xmlns:d="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/did/didl.xsd">
<d:DIDLInfo>
<dcterms:created xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/dcterms.xsd">2017-09-06T11:19:41Z</dcterms:created>
</d:DIDLInfo>
<d:Item id="hdl_10259_4586">
<d:Descriptor>
<d:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8">
<dii:Identifier xmlns:dii="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS" xsi:schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/dii/dii.xsd">urn:hdl:10259/4586</dii:Identifier>
</d:Statement>
</d:Descriptor>
<d:Descriptor>
<d:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8">
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>A comparison of Thellier-type and multispecimen paleointensity determinations on Pleistocene and historical lava flows from Lanzarote (Canary Islands, Spain)</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Calvo Rathert, Manuel</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Morales Contreras, Juan J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Carrancho Alonso, Ángel</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Goguitchaichvili, Avto</dc:creator>
<dc:description>Sixteen Miocene, Pleistocene, and historic lava flows have been sampled in Lanzarote (Canary&#xd;
Islands) for paleointensity analysis with both the Coe and multispecimen methods. Besides obtaining new&#xd;
data, the main goal of the study was the comparison of paleointensity results determined with two different&#xd;
techniques. Characteristic Remanent Magnetization (ChRM) directions were obtained in 15 flows, and&#xd;
12 were chosen for paleointensity determination. In Thellier-type experiments, a selection of reliable&#xd;
paleointensity determinations (43 of 78 studied samples) was performed using sets of criteria of different&#xd;
stringency, trying to relate the quality of results to the strictness of the chosen criteria. Uncorrected and&#xd;
fraction and domain-state corrected multispecimen paleointensity results were obtained in all flows. Results&#xd;
with the Coe method on historical flows either agree with the expected values or show moderately lower&#xd;
ones, but multispecimen determinations display a large deviation from the expected result in one case. No&#xd;
relation can be detected between correct or anomalous results and paleointensity determination quality or&#xd;
rock-magnetic properties. However, results on historical flows suggest that agreement between both&#xd;
methods could be a good indicator of correct determinations. Comparison of results obtained with both&#xd;
methods on seven Pleistocene flows yields an excellent agreement in four and disagreements in three&#xd;
cases. Pleistocene determinations were only accepted if either results from both methods agreed or a result&#xd;
was based on a sufficiently large number (n>4) of individual Thellier-type determinations. In most&#xd;
Pleistocene flows, a VADM around 5 31022 Am2 was observed, although two flows displayed higher values&#xd;
around 931022 Am2.</dc:description>
<dc:date>2017-09-06T11:19:41Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2017-09-06T11:19:41Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2016-09</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>1525-2027</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10259/4586</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.1002/2016GC006396</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems. 2016, V. 17, n. 9, p. 3638–3654</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016GC006396</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>2016 AGU</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:publisher>American Geophysical Union (AGU)</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc>
</d:Statement>
</d:Descriptor>
<d:Component id="10259_4586_1">
<d:Resource ref="https://riubu.ubu.es/bitstream/10259/4586/1/Calvo-GGG_2016.pdf" mimeType="application/pdf"/>
</d:Component>
</d:Item>
</d:DIDL></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>