<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-06-19T15:42:35Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/4724" metadataPrefix="marc">https://riubu.ubu.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/4724</identifier><datestamp>2023-10-02T08:19:52Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10259.4_2551</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_5086</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_2604</setSpec><setSpec>col_10259.4_2552</setSpec></header><metadata><record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<leader>00925njm 22002777a 4500</leader>
<datafield tag="042" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">dc</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="720" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Wadsworth, Caroline .</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="720" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Procopio, Noemi .</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="720" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Anderung, Cecilia .</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="720" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Carretero Díaz, José Miguel</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="720" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Iriarte Avilés, Eneko</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="720" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Valdiosera Morales, Cristina Eugenia</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="720" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Rengert Elburg .</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="720" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Kirsty Penkman .</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="720" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Buckley, Michael</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="c">2017-03</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Ancient DNA (aDNA) is themost informative biomolecule extracted fromskeletal remains at archaeological sites,&#xd;
but its survival is unpredictable and its extraction and analysis is time consuming, expensive and often fails. Several&#xd;
proposed methods for better understanding aDNA survival are based upon the characterisation of some aspect&#xd;
of protein survival, but these are typically non-specific; proteomic analyses may offer an attractive method&#xd;
for understanding preservation processes. In this study, in-depth proteomic (LC-Orbitrap-MS/MS) analyseswere&#xd;
carried out on 69 archaeological bovine bone and dentine samples from multiple European archaeological sites&#xd;
and comparedwith mitochondrial aDNA and amino acid racemisation (AAR) data. Comparisons of these data, including&#xd;
estimations of the relative abundances for seven selected non-collagenous proteins, indicate that the survival&#xd;
of aDNA in bone or dentine may correlatewith the survival of some proteins, and that proteome complexity&#xd;
is a more useful predictor of aDNA survival than protein abundance or AAR. The lack of a strong correlation between&#xd;
the recovery of aDNA and the proteome abundance may indicate that the survival of aDNA is more closely&#xd;
linked to its ability to associate with bone hydroxyapatite crystals rather than to associate with proteins.&#xd;
Significance: Ancient biomolecule survival remains poorly understood, even with great advancements in ‘omics’&#xd;
technologies, both in genomics and proteomics. This study investigates the survival of ancient DNA in relation to&#xd;
that of proteins, taking into account proteome complexity and the relative protein abundances to improve our&#xd;
understanding of survival mechanisms. The results show that although protein abundance is not necessarily directly&#xd;
related to aDNA survival, proteome complexity appears to be.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="024" ind2=" " ind1="8">
<subfield code="a">1874-3919</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="024" ind2=" " ind1="8">
<subfield code="a">http://hdl.handle.net/10259/4724</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="024" ind2=" " ind1="8">
<subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jprot.2017.01.004</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Ancient DNA</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Ancient proteins</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Proteomics</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Collagen</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Non-collagenous proteins</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
<subfield code="a">Comparing ancient DNA survival and proteome content in 69 archaeological cattle tooth and bone samples from multiple European sites</subfield>
</datafield>
</record></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>