<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-05-29T20:37:30Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/4829" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://riubu.ubu.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/4829</identifier><datestamp>2022-12-19T13:36:00Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10259_5841</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_5086</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_2604</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_4201</setSpec><setSpec>col_10259_5842</setSpec><setSpec>col_10259_4505</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>Effects of different types of rubric-based feedback on learning outcomes</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Sáiz Manzanares, María Consuelo</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Cuesta Segura, Isidoro Iván</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Alegre Calderón, Jesús Manuel</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Peñacoba Antona, Lorena</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>institutional change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>rubric</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>feedback</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>higher education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>self-regulation of learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enseñanza superior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Education, Higher</dc:subject>
<dc:description>Nowadays in higher education, the teaching procedures that lead to better learning&#xd;
outcomes (LO) require continuous analysis. Rubrics such as teaching feedback procedures&#xd;
have demonstrated their effectiveness at heightening the reflection of university&#xd;
students on their own practice. The aims were (1) to study the effects of different types&#xd;
of rubric-based feedback [from process-oriented feedback to traditional feedback] on&#xd;
LO and on student perceptions of subject matter knowledge (SPKI) after training in a&#xd;
comparison between students in engineering and students in the social sciences; (2) to&#xd;
analyze the relation between metacognitive skills and motivation with LO and SPKI; and&#xd;
(3) to validate the results with structural equation modeling (SEM). The study comprised&#xd;
a total of 171 university students (n = 80 from the mechanical engineering degree and&#xd;
n = 91 from social sciences degree). A quasi-experimental design with a control group&#xd;
was used to test aim 1 and a descriptive correlational design to test aim 2. SEM was&#xd;
applied to validate the results (aim 3). Significant differences were found between both&#xd;
types of rubric-based feedback (process-oriented v. traditional) in relation to LO, though&#xd;
not in relation to SPKI. The effects of the degree type were noted in LO but no in SPKI.&#xd;
Likewise, a relation between SPKI and motivation skills was found in engineering students.&#xd;
Accordingly, the type of degree and the characteristics of the subject modules&#xd;
appear to be determining factors in successful learning, while SPKI is directly linked to&#xd;
motivation skills. The SEM results validated these conclusions.</dc:description>
<dc:date>2018-06-28T11:04:34Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2018-06-28T11:04:34Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2017-07</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>2504-284X</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10259/4829</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.3389/feduc.2017.00034</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>Frontiers in Education. 2017, V. 2, art. 34</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2017.00034</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:publisher>Frontiers Media</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>