2026-07-30T23:19:25Zhttps://riubu.ubu.es/oai/requestoai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/61052022-11-29T11:13:27Zcom_10259.4_2560com_10259_5086com_10259_2604col_10259.4_2561
Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Burgos
author
Vashakidze, Goga
author
Goguitchaichvili, Avto
author
García Redondo, Natalia
author
Calvo Rathert, Manuel
author
Carrancho Alonso, Ángel
author
Cejudo, Ruben
author
Morales, Juan Ignacio .
author
Lebedev, Vladimir A.
author
Gabarashvili, Ketino
2021-11-04T13:13:15Z
2021-11-04T13:13:15Z
2019-12
1343-8832
http://hdl.handle.net/10259/6105
10.1186/s40623-019-1109-4
The radiocarbon technique is widely used to date Late Pleistocene and Holocene lava flows. The significant difference
with palaeomagnetic methods is that the 14C dating is performed on the organic matter carbonized by the rock
formation or the paleosols found within or below the lava flow. On the contrary, the archaeomagnetic dating allows
to date the moment when the lava is cooling down below the Curie temperatures. In the present study, we use the
paleomagnetic dating to constrain the age of the Tkarsheti monogenetic volcano located within the Kazbeki Volcanic
Province (Great Caucasus). A series of rock-magnetic experiments including the measurement of hysteresis curves,
isothermal remanence, back-field and continuous thermomagnetic curves were applied. These experiments indicated
that Pseudo-Single-Domain Ti-poor titanomagnetite is responsible for remanence. A characteristic remanent magnetization
was obtained for all twenty analyzed samples yielding a stable single magnetization component observed
upon both thermal and alternating field treatments. Comparison of the mean directions obtained (Inc = 48.6º,
Dec = 6.4º, A95
= 4.0° and K = 67) with the SCHA.DIF.14k model yielded two main time intervals (4740–4650 or 4427–
4188 BC) as the best age estimate of the Lesser Tkarsheti lava flow. These results suggest an earlier age (between
approximately 200 and 700 years) for this monogenetic lava flow than expected from the estimated age provided by
a former 14C dating obtained in 1973 on woody remains. This first attempt to use the archaeomagnetic technique in
the Caucasus indicates that the SCHA.DIF.14k geomagnetic model may be successfully used for dating purposes in
the region.
eng
Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Great Caucasus
Monogenetic volcano
Kazbeki
Magnetic dating
Magnetic dating of the Holocene monogenetic Tkarsheti volcano in the Kazbeki region (Great Caucasus)
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
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
URL
https://riubu.ubu.es/bitstream/10259/6105/1/Vashakidze-eps_2019.pdf
File
MD5
e67b6e68fd48a547d803264fdcabd3ab
1273174
application/pdf
Vashakidze-eps_2019.pdf