2026-09-16T03:25:45Zhttps://riubu.ubu.es/oai/request

oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/61082022-11-29T08:42:41Zcom_10259.4_2560com_10259_5086com_10259_2604col_10259.4_2561

00925njm 22002777a 4500 dc Sánchez Moreno, Elisa María author Calvo Rathert, Manuel author Goguitchaichvili, Avto author Tauxe, Lisa . author Vashakidze, George T. author Lebedev, Vladimir A. author 2020-03 A palaeointensity study has been carried out on a Pliocene sequence of 20 consecutive lava flows where previous directional results seem to reflect anomalous behaviour of the Earth’s magnetic field (EMF), which can be explained by a polarity transition record or non-averaged palaeosecular variation or both. Here, we perform a total of 55 palaeointensity determinations using the original Thellier–Thellier (TT) method and 100 with the IZZI method.We assess the performance of our selection criteria using a set of strict threshold values applied to a set of test data whose TRMs were acquired in known fields. Absolute palaeointensity determinations that passed our selection criteria were obtained on four specimens with the TT method and on 41 specimens with the IZZI method. Application of reliability criteria at a site level yielded palaeointensity results in 8 of 20 studied lava flows. We obtained median values of VADM between 28.9 and 45.6 ZAm2 for the reverse polarity lower Apnia section, while the normal polarity upper section displayed a single value of 54.6 ZAm2. The low palaeointensity values before a transitional direction lava flow and the higher value after it, suggest the common behaviour at the start of a polarity reversal and the recovery after it. However, an isolated record of a stable EMF, where the intensity is lower than the current for the same location (83.7 ZAm2), cannot be discarded. Consequently, this interpretation would support a weak time-averaged field. 1365-246X http://hdl.handle.net/10259/6108 10.1093/gji/ggz533 Palaeointensity Magnetic field variations through time Palaeomagnetism Weak palaeointensity results over a Pliocene volcanic sequence from Lesser Caucasus (Georgia): transitional record or time averaged field?