<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-09T11:48:42Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/7398" metadataPrefix="didl">https://riubu.ubu.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/7398</identifier><datestamp>2023-02-07T01:05:27Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10259_7396</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259.4_2505</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259.4_106</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_2604</setSpec><setSpec>col_10259_7397</setSpec></header><metadata><d:DIDL xmlns:d="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/did/didl.xsd">
<d:DIDLInfo>
<dcterms:created xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/dcterms.xsd">2023-02-06T11:41:37Z</dcterms:created>
</d:DIDLInfo>
<d:Item id="hdl_10259_7398">
<d:Descriptor>
<d:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8">
<dii:Identifier xmlns:dii="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS" xsi:schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/dii/dii.xsd">urn:hdl:10259/7398</dii:Identifier>
</d:Statement>
</d:Descriptor>
<d:Descriptor>
<d:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8">
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>The energy threshold in dynamic probing</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Ibáñez García, Sergio</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Sagaseta, César</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Fernández del Rincón, Alfonso</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Penetration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Dynamic</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Probing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Energy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Threshold</dc:subject>
<dc:description>In dynamic probing tests, penetration is closely related to the potential energy of the hammer (nominal energy). This energy&#xd;
stems from the mass and free fall of the hammer after being released from a certain height. Penetration depends on energy,&#xd;
although only on a portion of that nominal energy that is effectively transferred to the rods (ENTHRU) and, more precisely,&#xd;
the energy that reaches the cone (ENTHRUcone). ENTHRU can be measured by monitoring the upper part of the drive rods.&#xd;
To calculate ENTHRUcone, ENTHRU needs to be corrected in three ways. Firstly, the energy loss in the energy transmission&#xd;
through the rods has to be subtracted, as well as the energy loss due to the skin friction of the rods along the soil around&#xd;
them. It is also necessary to add the energy due to the rod weight penetrating the soil. The main hypothesis assumed and later&#xd;
experimentally proved in this paper is based on the fact that ENTHRUcone has to be greater than a certain value or minimum&#xd;
energy (energy threshold: Th) in order to be able to cause penetration. After analyzing more than one hundred blows with&#xd;
different hammer mass and drop height, a small but consistent Th and a linear relationship between energy and penetration&#xd;
beyond it were found. The energy that really produces penetration (ENPEN) will be ENTHRUcone, minus Th. This allows for&#xd;
improved energy corrections and correlations between results from various kinds of penetration tests.</dc:description>
<dc:date>2023-02-06T11:41:37Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2023-02-06T11:41:37Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2022-10</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>1435-9529</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10259/7398</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.1007/s10064-022-02945-z</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>1435-9537</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment. 2022, V. 81, n. 11, 459</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-022-02945-z</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>Atribución 4.0 Internacional</dc:rights>
<dc:publisher>Springer Nature</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc>
</d:Statement>
</d:Descriptor>
<d:Component id="10259_7398_1">
<d:Resource ref="https://riubu.ubu.es/bitstream/10259/7398/1/Ib%c3%a1%c3%b1ez-bege_2022.pdf" mimeType="application/pdf"/>
</d:Component>
</d:Item>
</d:DIDL></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>