<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-20T02:43:58Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/7492" metadataPrefix="etdms">https://riubu.ubu.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/7492</identifier><datestamp>2024-05-10T09:42:17Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10259_6251</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_5086</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_2604</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259.4_2506</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259.4_2505</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259.4_106</setSpec><setSpec>col_10259_6252</setSpec><setSpec>col_10259_7491</setSpec></header><metadata><thesis xmlns="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/etdms.xsd">
<title>Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) between standard gypsum ceiling tile and polyurethane gypsum ceiling tile</title>
<creator>Rodrigo Bravo, Alba</creator>
<creator>Alameda Cuenca-Romero, Lourdes</creator>
<creator>Calderón Carpintero, Verónica</creator>
<creator>Rodríguez Sáiz, Ángel</creator>
<creator>Gutiérrez González, Sara</creator>
<subject>Gypsum ceiling tile</subject>
<subject>Polyurethane waste</subject>
<subject>Life Cycle Assessment-LCA</subject>
<subject>Cradle to grave</subject>
<subject>Environmental assessment</subject>
<subject>Environmental impact</subject>
<subject>Circular Economy</subject>
<description>In this paper, the LCA of two gypsum ceiling tiles is compared, the first one is a traditional gypsum tile&#xd;
and the second is a new eco ceiling tile in which polyurethane foam waste has been incorporated.&#xd;
Both tiles were made at one of the largest gypsum tile factories in Europe. The life cycle assessment&#xd;
has been considered from cradle to grave for which the corresponding production stages have been&#xd;
defined. This includes the extraction and transportation of raw materials, the manufacturing process,&#xd;
transportation to the client, the use of the product and the end of its useful life. The results show that&#xd;
the tile with polyurethane has a better environmental performance than the standard commercial ceiling&#xd;
tile. This is quantified as a 14% reduction in energy consumption, a 14% reduction in CO2 emissions and a&#xd;
25% reduction in water consumption compared with the standard tile, all the while maintaining the technical performance. An analysis of the results suggests that the new eco product has a competitive advantage on the market thanks to its environmental improvements and good technical performance.</description>
<date>2023-03-06</date>
<date>2023-03-06</date>
<date>2022-03</date>
<type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</type>
<identifier>0378-7788</identifier>
<identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10259/7492</identifier>
<identifier>10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.111867</identifier>
<language>eng</language>
<relation>Energy and Buildings. 2022, V. 259, 111867</relation>
<relation>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.111867</relation>
<relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC//LIFE16 ENV%2FES%2F000254/EU/REcovery of POLYurethane for reUSE in eco-efficient materials/LIFE-Repolyuse/</relation>
<relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/Junta de Castilla y León//BU070P20//Prefabricados de mortero eco-eficientes aligerados con residuos poliméricos industriales con propiedades estructurales y térmicas mejoradas/</relation>
<rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</rights>
<rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights>
<rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional</rights>
<publisher>Elsevier</publisher>
</thesis></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>