<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-21T00:05:42Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/8082" metadataPrefix="marc">https://riubu.ubu.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/8082</identifier><datestamp>2023-11-22T01:05:29Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10259_6229</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_4534</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259.4_106</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_2604</setSpec><setSpec>col_10259_6230</setSpec></header><metadata><record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<leader>00925njm 22002777a 4500</leader>
<datafield tag="042" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">dc</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="720" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Alonso Mallo, Isaías</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="720" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Cano, Begoña</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="720" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Reguera López, Nuria</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="c">2021-01</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">In this article, we offer a comparison in terms of computational efficiency between two techniques to avoid order reduction when using Strang method to integrate nonlinear initial boundary value problems with time-dependent boundary conditions. We see that it is important to consider an exponential method for the integration of the linear nonhomogeneous and stiff part in the technique by Einkemmer et al. so that the latter is comparable in efficiency with that suggested by Alonso et al. Some other advantages of the technique suggested by Alonso et al. are stated in the conclusions.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="024" ind2=" " ind1="8">
<subfield code="a">0749-159X</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="024" ind2=" " ind1="8">
<subfield code="a">http://hdl.handle.net/10259/8082</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="024" ind2=" " ind1="8">
<subfield code="a">10.1002/num.22556</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="024" ind2=" " ind1="8">
<subfield code="a">1098-2426</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Avoiding order reduction</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Computational comparison</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Strang splitting</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
<subfield code="a">Comparison of efficiency among different techniques to avoid order reduction with Strang splitting</subfield>
</datafield>
</record></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>