<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-06-16T10:54:50Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/8346" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://riubu.ubu.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/8346</identifier><datestamp>2024-01-16T01:05:27Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10259_6171</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_5086</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_2604</setSpec><setSpec>col_10259_6172</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>Mechanical and environmental advantages of the revaluation of raw-crushed wind-turbine blades as a concrete component</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Revilla Cuesta, Víctor</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Manso Morato, Javier</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Hurtado Alonso, Nerea</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Skaf Revenga, Marta</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Ortega López, Vanesa</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Concrete</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Raw-crushed wind-turbine blade (RCWTB)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mechanical properties</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Carbon footprint</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Waste consumption</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ingeniería civil</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Materiales de construcción</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Civil engineering</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Building materials</dc:subject>
<dc:description>The large number of wind farms that will have to be dismantled in coming years is prompting a&#xd;
search for reliable wind-turbine-blade recycling methods, but there is not yet a broad consensus&#xd;
on the most appropriate. Jointly crushing all the blade components produces a material that is&#xd;
referred to as Raw-Crushed Wind-Turbine Blade (RCWTB), formed by fibers from the crushing of&#xd;
Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) composite, and spherical balsa-wood and polyurethane&#xd;
particles. The incorporation of this inexpensive and easy-to-produce material in concrete could&#xd;
help to solve the problem of blades recycling, but this approach has not been extensively evaluated in the literature. In the present study, the overall addition of RCWTB up to 6 % by volume&#xd;
in concrete was analyzed in terms of mechanical performance and carbon footprint. The results&#xd;
showed that the incorporation of RCWTB might be beneficial for both the mechanical behavior of&#xd;
concrete and its sustainability rating. RCWTB at 1.5 % improved compressive strength in a&#xd;
conventional concrete design, yielding values above 50 MPa at 28 days. Furthermore, this content&#xd;
reduced the carbon footprint per unit of compressive strength by 0.12 kgCO2eq/(MPa⋅m3&#xd;
).&#xd;
Similarly, 6.0 % RCWTB improved flexural strength, reaching values higher than 6 MPa, and&#xd;
reducing the carbon footprint per unit of flexural strength by 7.5 %. The waste had no significant&#xd;
negative effect on the temporal development of the mechanical performance of concrete.&#xd;
Furthermore, if all the wind-turbine blades annually dismantled in Spain, the world’s fifth largest&#xd;
wind-energy producer, were crushed and converted into RCWTB, it could all be recycled at rates&#xd;
of 0.6–2.2 % within the total annual volume of commercial concrete produced in Spain. These&#xd;
figures show that RCWTB production is a feasible solution for recycling decommissioned windturbine blades, as it can be successfully used for manufacturing sustainable concretes with suitable mechanical and environmental performance levels.</dc:description>
<dc:description>This research work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Universities, MICINN, AEI, EU, ERDF and NextGenerationEU/PRTR [grant numbers PID2020-113837RB-I00; 10.13039/501100011033; TED2021-129715 B–I00; FPU21/04364]; the Junta de Castilla y León (Regional Government) and ERDF [grant number UIC-231; BU033P23; BU066-22]; and, finally, the University of Burgos [grant number SUCONS, Y135. GI].</dc:description>
<dc:date>2024-01-15T12:49:35Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2024-01-15T12:49:35Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2024-04</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>2352-7102</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10259/8346</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jobe.2023.108383</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>Journal of Building Engineering. 2024, V. 82, 108383</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.108383</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>