<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-16T03:26:00Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/8414" metadataPrefix="didl">https://riubu.ubu.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/8414</identifier><datestamp>2024-01-23T01:05:29Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10259_4365</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_5086</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_2604</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259.4_2520</setSpec><setSpec>col_10259_4366</setSpec><setSpec>col_10259.4_2521</setSpec></header><metadata><d:DIDL xmlns:d="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/did/didl.xsd">
<d:DIDLInfo>
<dcterms:created xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/dcterms.xsd">2024-01-22T09:05:59Z</dcterms:created>
</d:DIDLInfo>
<d:Item id="hdl_10259_8414">
<d:Descriptor>
<d:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8">
<dii:Identifier xmlns:dii="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS" xsi:schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/dii/dii.xsd">urn:hdl:10259/8414</dii:Identifier>
</d:Statement>
</d:Descriptor>
<d:Descriptor>
<d:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8">
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>The Impact of In Vitro Digestion on the Polyphenol Content and Antioxidant Activity of Spanish Ciders</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Cavia Camarero, María del Mar</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Arlanzón, Nerea</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Busto Vázquez, Natalia</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Carrillo Pérez, Celia</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Alonso de la Torre, Sara</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Apple wine</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Digestion protocols</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Antioxidants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>DPPH</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>ABTS</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>FRAP</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>ORAC</dc:subject>
<dc:description>Various factors can influence the polyphenol content and the antioxidant capacity of ciders,&#xd;
such as the apple variety, its degree of maturity, apple farming and storage conditions, and the&#xd;
cider-fermentation method, all of which explains why ciders of different origin present different&#xd;
values. In addition, digestive processes could have some effects on the properties of cider. Hence,&#xd;
the objective of this study is to characterize Spanish ciders in terms of their polyphenol content&#xd;
and antioxidant capacity and to ascertain whether those same properties differ in digested ciders.&#xd;
In total, 19 ciders were studied from three different zones within Spain: Asturias (A) (10), the&#xd;
Basque Country (BC) (6), and Castile-and-Leon (CL) (3). A range of assays was used to determine&#xd;
the total polyphenol content and the antioxidant capacity of the ciders. In addition, a digestive&#xd;
process was simulated in vitro, assessing whether the use of amylase might influence the recovery of&#xd;
bioactive compounds after digestion. The Basque Country ciders presented higher total polyphenol&#xd;
contents (830 ± 179 GAE/L) and higher antioxidant capacities (DPPH: 5.4 ± 1.6 mmol TE/L; ABTS:&#xd;
6.5 ± 2.0 mmol TE/L; FRAP: 6.9 ± 1.6 mmol TE/L) than the other ciders that were studied. The&#xd;
in vitro digestion process, regardless of the use of amylase, implied a loss of phenolic compounds&#xd;
(598 ± 239 mg GAE/L undigested samples; 466 ± 146 mg GAE/L digested without amylase samples;&#xd;
420 ± 115 mg GAE/L digested with amylase samples), although the variation in antioxidant activity&#xd;
depended on the assay chosen for its determination.</dc:description>
<dc:date>2024-01-22T09:05:59Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2024-01-22T09:05:59Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2023-04</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10259/8414</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.3390/foods12091861</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>2304-8158</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>Foods. 2023, V. 12, n. 9, 1861</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12091861</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>Atribución 4.0 Internacional</dc:rights>
<dc:publisher>MDPI</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc>
</d:Statement>
</d:Descriptor>
<d:Component id="10259_8414_1">
<d:Resource ref="https://riubu.ubu.es/bitstream/10259/8414/1/Cavia-Foods_2023.pdf" mimeType="application/pdf"/>
</d:Component>
</d:Item>
</d:DIDL></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>