<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-19T13:28:32Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/8676" metadataPrefix="etdms">https://riubu.ubu.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/8676</identifier><datestamp>2025-02-03T09:01:54Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10259_3969</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_5086</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_2604</setSpec><setSpec>col_10259_3970</setSpec></header><metadata><thesis xmlns="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/etdms.xsd">
<title>Influence of the backfill parameters in distinct element modelling of a backfill masonry arch bridge through the PFC2D software</title>
<creator>García Gómez, Felipe</creator>
<creator>Martínez Martínez, José Antonio</creator>
<creator>García Castillo, Luis Mª</creator>
<subject>Discrete element mehtod</subject>
<subject>Backfill masonry bridge</subject>
<subject>PFC2D</subject>
<subject>Geomechanical modelling</subject>
<subject>Soil-structure interaction</subject>
<description>This paper presents an investigation on how to model a backfill masonry arch bridge using the discrete element method (DEM). The PFC2D software is used for this purpose. A certain backfill masonry arch bridge is modelled, with different types of fill, mortar and voussoir materials. A biaxial test has been programmed using ‘FISH’ code to obtain the micro-parameters used in the model so that they match the macro-parameters obtained from a real biaxial test. The arch is loaded until its collapse in three different load cases. Further discussion on the influence of the backfill parameters is presented as well as a sensitivity analysis for the arch bridge.</description>
<date>2024-02-12</date>
<date>2024-02-12</date>
<date>2022</date>
<type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</type>
<identifier>1748-6025</identifier>
<identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10259/8676</identifier>
<identifier>10.1080/17486025.2019.1680883</identifier>
<identifier>1748-6033</identifier>
<language>eng</language>
<relation>Geomechanics and Geoengineering. 2022, V. 17, n. 1, p. 22-29</relation>
<relation>https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2019.1680883</relation>
<rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</rights>
<rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights>
<rights>Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional</rights>
<publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher>
</thesis></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>