<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-06-17T15:57:59Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/8994" metadataPrefix="marc">https://riubu.ubu.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/8994</identifier><datestamp>2024-05-13T10:42:05Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10259_5238</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_5086</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_2604</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259_3576</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259.4_2574</setSpec><setSpec>com_10259.4_106</setSpec><setSpec>col_10259_6212</setSpec><setSpec>col_10259_3577</setSpec></header><metadata><record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<leader>00925njm 22002777a 4500</leader>
<datafield tag="042" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">dc</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="720" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Aguilar Conde, Pablo</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="720" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Prieto Moreno, Begoña</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="720" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Santidrián Arroyo, Alicia</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="c">2016-05</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Our purpose here is to analyze how salary reviews are established in Collective Bargaining Agreements, while arguing the case for a new salary review model that reinforces the link between wage-setting mechanisms and changes in productivity. The thinking behind Spanish labour and mercantile legislation promotes changes to salary review methods in Collective Bargaining Agreements, based on both agency and stakeholder theory. Our proposal for a new model will join the interests of directors and those of other employees. The rewards produced by the work of each group will be based on the business value generated by all internal stakeholders of the company: shareholders, directors and employees. Labour relations are certainly moving towards a scenario that makes it desirable to achieve common goals, in which companies can distribute their benefits to all of their stakeholders: principally shareholders, directors, and employees, as we propose in this paper.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="024" ind2=" " ind1="8">
<subfield code="a">1468-4497</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="024" ind2=" " ind1="8">
<subfield code="a">http://hdl.handle.net/10259/8994</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="024" ind2=" " ind1="8">
<subfield code="a">10.26595/eamr.2014.2.2.1</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="024" ind2=" " ind1="8">
<subfield code="a">2385-3921</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Collective business agreement</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Corporate social responsibility</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Business profits</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Accounting information</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
<subfield code="a">Use of accounting in company collective agreements. Proposal for a new salary review model in the context of corporate social responsibility and stackeholder theory</subfield>
</datafield>
</record></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>