2026-07-08T19:27:28Zhttps://riubu.ubu.es/oai/request

oai:riubu.ubu.es:10259/99182025-06-05T22:42:13Zcom_10259_4734com_10259_5086com_10259_2604col_10259_4735

00925njm 22002777a 4500 dc Sánchez Rodríguez, Ángel author García Sánchez, Efraín author Montoya Lozano, Mar author Velandia Morales, Andrea author Muelas Lobato, Roberto author 2024-06 Perceived economic inequality is positively associated with public support for policies to reduce it. However, providing information about economic inequality does not necessarily motivate people to support redistributive policies. This inconsistency may be due to how people interpret the information about inequality. We argue that the interpretation of information about inequality difers between individuals as a function of the characteristics of the source and people’s ideologies. We conducted two experiments using an exploratory (N=239) and confrmatory (N=707) strategy. We found that attitudes toward redistribution increased when a seemingly neutral international institution (as opposed to a left-wing political party) provided information about economic inequality due to the credibility attributed to the source—but not due to power and familiarity. Moreover, the efect of providing information about inequality on support for redistribution (via source credibility) depended on people’s ideologies: it was positive and statistically signifcant for people who held more (vs. less) system-justifying beliefs. These fndings contribute to understanding the interplay between social psychological processes, communication strategies, and attitudes toward redistribution. 0885-7466 http://hdl.handle.net/10259/9918 10.1007/s11211-024-00435-z 1573-6725 Economic inequality Political ideology Elaboration likelihood model System justification When and How Information About Economic Inequality Affects Attitudes Towards Redistribution