dc.contributor.author | Maingi, Evan Maina | |
dc.contributor.author | Alonso Abad, Mª Pilar | |
dc.contributor.author | Angurel Lámban, Luis Alberto | |
dc.contributor.author | Fuente Leis, Germán F. de la | |
dc.contributor.author | Dubernet, Stéphan | |
dc.contributor.author | Chapoulie, Rémy | |
dc.contributor.author | Mellouët, Oriane | |
dc.contributor.author | Vally, Elodie | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-11-02T12:25:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-02T12:25:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-02 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10259/7923 | |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of this research work was to conduct a comparative study on the effectiveness
of the application of chemical cleaning versus laser cleaning in the removal of surface congruent
dissolution products from a potash-lime–silica historical stained-glass sample. EDTA was selected
as the chemical cleaning agent. Laser cleaning was performed using a 238 fs pulse UV (343 nm)
laser. The comparative cleaning studies were carried out on a stained-glass piece supplied by the
Maison Lorin Glass Restoration Workshop from Chartres, France. Given the complex nature, irregular
thickness and heterogeneity of the encrustations found on the glass, the two cleaning approaches
were carefully performed step by step, while monitoring the process using an optical microscope.
Raman spectroscopy and field emission scanning electron microscopy were used to characterize the
changes induced on the sample surface during the cleaning process. The results demonstrate that the
two cleaning approaches were able to eliminate the outer surface dark layer associated with carbon
compounds, as well as the external part of the white layer generated by the crystallization of salts,
formed with the dissolved elements after a reaction with the air. A comparison of the advantages and
disadvantages of each method is also presented. | en |
dc.description.sponsorship | This research was funded by the H2020-MSCA-ITN-EJD/ED-ARCHMAT action under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 766311. The authors acknowledge the partial support obtained from Gobierno de Aragón (research group T54_20R). | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | es |
dc.publisher | MDPI | es |
dc.relation.ispartof | Heritage. 2023, V. 6, n. 2, p. 1942-1957 | es |
dc.rights | Atribución 4.0 Internacional | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | Stained glass | en |
dc.subject | Laser cleaning | en |
dc.subject | Chemical clearing | en |
dc.subject | Encrustations | en |
dc.subject | Conservation | en |
dc.subject.other | Arqueología | es |
dc.subject.other | Archaeology | en |
dc.subject.other | Tecnología | es |
dc.subject.other | Technology | en |
dc.subject.other | Química física | es |
dc.subject.other | Chemistry, Physical and theoretical | en |
dc.subject.other | Artes decorativas-Burgos | es |
dc.subject.other | Decorative arts-Burgos | en |
dc.title | Chemical and Laser Cleaning of Corrosion Encrustations on Historical Stained Glass: A Comparative Study | en |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6020104 | es |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/heritage6020104 | |
dc.identifier.essn | 2571-9408 | |
dc.journal.title | Heritage | en |
dc.volume.number | 6 | es |
dc.issue.number | 2 | es |
dc.page.initial | 1942 | es |
dc.page.final | 1957 | es |
dc.type.hasVersion | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es |