Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorCubo Delgado, Esther 
dc.contributor.authorSáez Velasco, Sara 
dc.contributor.authorDelgado Benito, Vanesa 
dc.contributor.authorAusín Villaverde, Vanesa 
dc.contributor.authorTrejo Gabriel y Galán, José Mª
dc.contributor.authorMartín Santidrián, Asunción
dc.contributor.authorMacarrón Vicente, Jesus
dc.contributor.authorCordero Guevara, José
dc.contributor.authorLouis, Elan D.
dc.contributor.authorBenito-León, Julián
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-17T13:56:01Z
dc.date.available2024-01-17T13:56:01Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.issn0885-3185
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10259/8378
dc.description.abstractBackground: The main purpose was to validate a multistage protocol to screen tic disorders in mainstream and special education centers and to investigate whether telephone-based interviews were accurate to diagnose tic disorders when compared with in-person neurological interviews. Methods: A school-based survey of children and adolescents (6–16 years). A proxy report questionnaire for tic disorders was completed by teachers, observers, and parents. The diagnosis was confirmed by the neurologist based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental disorders (DSM-IV TR) criteria. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, the likelihood ratio for a positive result (LR+), and the Kappa coefficients (k) for telephone-based interviews reliability were calculated. Results: One hundred twenty subjects, 57 from special education center and 63 from a mainstream school were studied. The sensitivity of the proxy report questionnaire was 58% and 36% when completed by the observers (mainstream and special education center, respectively), 40 and 73% when completed by the teachers, and 58 and 36% when completed by the parents. Using any of these 3 screening sources, the sensitivity was 92%, the positive predictive value was 38%, and negative predictive value was 97% (mainstream schools), whereas the sensitivity was 82%, the positive predictive value was 20%, and negative predictive value was 82% (special education centers). Parents (mainstream schools) and teachers (special education center) produced the highest LR+ (7.25 and 1.26, respectively) and the intraobserver reliability of the telephone-based interviews versus in-person neurological interviews gave a k coefficient of 0.83. Conclusions: The efficiency of different screening instruments for tic disorders seems to vary in different settings. Telephone-based interviews may be a valid and convenient backup to ascertain the diagnosis of tic disorders when face-to-face neurological examination is not possible.es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherWileyes
dc.relation.ispartofMovement Disorders. 2011, V. 26, n. 3, p. 520-526es
dc.subjectTicses
dc.subjectScreeninges
dc.subjectTelephone-based interviewes
dc.subjectSchool sampleses
dc.subject.otherNeurologíaes
dc.subject.otherNeurologyes
dc.subject.otherPsicologíaes
dc.subject.otherPsychologyes
dc.subject.otherSaludes
dc.subject.otherHealthes
dc.subject.otherSistema nervioso-Enfermedadeses
dc.subject.otherNervous system-Diseaseses
dc.titleValidation of screening instruments for neuroepidemiological surveys of tic disorderses
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccesses
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1002/mds.23460es
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/mds.23460
dc.identifier.essn1531-8257
dc.journal.titleMovement Disorderses
dc.volume.number26es
dc.issue.number3es
dc.page.initial520es
dc.page.final526es
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones


Arquivos deste item

Este item aparece na(s) seguinte(s) coleção(s)

Mostrar registro simples