Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorManso Morato, Javier 
dc.contributor.authorHurtado Alonso, Nerea 
dc.contributor.authorRevilla Cuesta, Víctor 
dc.contributor.authorSkaf Revenga, Marta 
dc.contributor.authorOrtega López, Vanesa 
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-15T16:58:03Z
dc.date.available2025-01-15T16:58:03Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn2352-7102
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10259/9939
dc.description.abstractConcrete is the most environmentally demanding construction material in use worldwide, so evaluating the sustainability performance of concrete is therefore essential. Fiber-Reinforced Concrete (FRC) can diminish the carbon footprint of concrete, being verified by Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). In this systematic review, using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, 69 documents were studied to survey the existing literature on FRC, its LCA methodology and results, and the mechanical performance of the mixes. The results were then presented, and the fibers were characterized, to analyze both the environmental and mechanical performance of the selected research papers using representative indexes, mostly regarding Global Warming Potential (GWP). These indexes showed that the environmental impacts of the FRC mixes could be reduced, even reaching reductions in the GWP of FRC of up to 94 %, without hindering their mechanical performance. FRC sustainability was highly dependent upon the nature and treatment of the used fibers. Thus, steel or synthetic fibers were the most common, yet the most polluting to produce, while some recycled fibers reached high environmental impacts due to the necessary treatments to obtain adequate characteristics, as their non-optimized production procedures can result in up to 7 % increase of GWP of FRC despite of the incorporation of these sustainable raw materials. Nevertheless, those FRC mixes achieved promising LCA results, even diving by half their GWP, when these treatments and procedures were carefully designed. Further development of concrete manufacturing processes and sustainable fiber recovery and characterization are also needed for successful implementation of greener solutions.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Universities, MICINN, AEI, EU, ERDF and NextGenerationEU/PRTR [grant numbers PID2020-113837RB-I00; 10.13039/501100011033; TED2021-129715 B–I00; PID2023-146642OB-I00; FPU21/04364]; the Junta de Castilla y León (Regional Government) and ERDF [grant number UIC-231; BU033P23; BU066-22]; and, finally, the University of Burgos [grant number SUCONS, Y135. GI].en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherElsevieres
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Building Engineering. 2024, V. 94, 110062es
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectFiber-reinforced concreteen
dc.subjectLife cycle assessmenten
dc.subjectPRISMAen
dc.subjectGlobal warming potentialen
dc.subjectPerformance-to-sustainability balanceen
dc.subject.otherIngeniería civiles
dc.subject.otherCivil engineeringen
dc.subject.otherMateriales de construcciónes
dc.subject.otherBuilding materialsen
dc.subject.otherHormigón-Ensayoses
dc.subject.otherConcrete-Testingen
dc.titleFiber-Reinforced concrete and its life cycle assessment: A systematic reviewen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110062es
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110062
dc.journal.titleJournal of Building Engineeringen
dc.volume.number94es
dc.page.initial110062es
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée