This paper explores the translation of the global decarbonization goal into net-zero organizational targets. Building on the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework developed by Ostrom and focusing on the case of the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), we study how accounting mediates in this translation. The study consists of an in-depth examination of SBTi's publicly available sources, which helped us identify and structure the subsequent analysis around four analytical dimensions: timeframe, target boundary, methods, and monitoring mechanisms. The findings of our analysis suggest that different points of friction are challenging the mediation of accounting and hindering the definition of net-zero targets and, therefore, corporate decision-making in response to climate urgency. The implications of our case spill over into recent sustainability standards, which provide a lower level of granularity in defining the technical accounting aspects of net-zero targets.
