Universidad de Burgos RIUBU Principal Default Universidad de Burgos RIUBU Principal Default
  • español
  • English
  • français
  • Deutsch
  • português (Brasil)
  • italiano
Universidad de Burgos RIUBU Principal Default
  • Ayuda
  • Contact Us
  • Send Feedback
  • Acceso abierto
    • Archivar en RIUBU
    • Acuerdos editoriales para la publicación en acceso abierto
    • Controla tus derechos, facilita el acceso abierto
    • Sobre el acceso abierto y la UBU
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of RIUBUCommunities and CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Compartir

    View Item 
    •   RIUBU Home
    • E-Prints and Research Data
    • Untitled
    • Untitled
    • Untitled
    • View Item
    •   RIUBU Home
    • E-Prints and Research Data
    • Untitled
    • Untitled
    • Untitled
    • View Item

    Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10259/8012

    Título
    Student Perceptions of Formative Assessment and Cooperative Work on a Technical Engineering Course
    Autor
    Revilla Cuesta, VíctorUBU authority Orcid
    Skaf Revenga, MartaUBU authority Orcid
    Manso Villalaín, Juan ManuelUBU authority Orcid
    Ortega López, VanesaUBU authority Orcid
    Publicado en
    Sustainability. 2020, V. 12, n. 1, 4569
    Editorial
    MDPI
    Fecha de publicación
    2020-06
    DOI
    10.3390/su12114569
    Abstract
    Formative Assessment and Cooperative Work (FACW) is a teaching methodology that promotes student learning based on peer support, both in solving problems and identifying the mistakes made through feedback. The perceptions of 49 mechanical engineering students at the University of Burgos are analyzed in this article with regard to their first practical experience of FACW methodology in a technical subject, characterized by a highly complex content and a strong link between theoretical and practical concepts. The responses of the students to two blocks of open questions were evaluated in a qualitative, mixed, and statistical analysis. Various aspects that the students raised in relation to FACW could therefore be studied, such as their points of view towards: (1) The usefulness of FACW teaching modality; and (2) their preferences regarding the optimum teaching modality. The results showed that, although the students expressed favorable opinions towards FACW, they did not consider, in general, that teamwork was necessary for optimal learning, revealing a clear dependence on formal classroom presentations for the explanation of theoretical concepts. Students considered that theoretical concepts could not be autonomously acquired. Therefore, the application of the FACW teaching methodology to these courses could be especially beneficial to favor autonomous learning and to develop teamwork skills, training engineers with the right knowledge and skills today for tomorrow’s world.
    Palabras clave
    Formative assessment and cooperative work
    Active and collaborative learning
    Student-centered learning environments
    Technical engineering subject
    Mixed analysis
    Autonomy
    Teamwork skills
    Teaching guidance
    Materia
    Ingeniería civil
    Civil engineering
    Materiales de construcción
    Building materials
    Enseñanza superior
    Education, Higher
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10259/8012
    Versión del editor
    https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114569
    Collections
    • Untitled
    Atribución 4.0 Internacional
    Documento(s) sujeto(s) a una licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional
    Files in this item
    Nombre:
    Revilla-sustainability_2020.pdf
    Tamaño:
    11.75Mb
    Formato:
    Adobe PDF
    Thumbnail
    FilesOpen

    Métricas

    Citas

    Ver estadísticas de uso

    Export

    RISMendeleyRefworksZotero
    • edm
    • marc
    • xoai
    • qdc
    • ore
    • ese
    • dim
    • uketd_dc
    • oai_dc
    • etdms
    • rdf
    • mods
    • mets
    • didl
    • premis
    Show full item record

    Universidad de Burgos

    Powered by MIT's. DSpace software, Version 5.10