Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorLaguna Teno, Félix
dc.contributor.authorSuarez Diez, Maria
dc.contributor.authorTamayo Ramos, Juan Antonio 
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-29T11:29:21Z
dc.date.available2023-03-29T11:29:21Z
dc.date.issued2020-08
dc.identifier.issn1664-302X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10259/7616
dc.description.abstractGraphene oxide has become a very appealing nanomaterial during the last years for many different applications, but its possible impact in different biological systems remains unclear. Here, an assessment to understand the toxicity of different commercial graphene oxide nanomaterials on the unicellular fungal model organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae was performed. For this task, an RNA purification protocol was optimized to avoid the high nucleic acid absorption capacity of graphene oxide. The developed protocol is based on a sorbitol gradient separation process for the isolation of adequate ribonucleic acid levels (in concentration and purity) from yeast cultures exposed to the carbon derived nanomaterial. To pinpoint potential toxicity mechanisms and pathways, the transcriptome of S. cerevisiae exposed to 160 mg L–1 of monolayer graphene oxide (GO) and graphene oxide nanocolloids (GOC) was studied and compared. Both graphene oxide products induced expression changes in a common group of genes (104), many of them related to iron homeostasis, starvation and stress response, amino acid metabolism and formate catabolism. Also, a high number of genes were only differentially expressed in either GO (236) or GOC (1077) exposures, indicating that different commercial products can induce specific changes in the physiological state of the fungus.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the European Union’s H2020 Research and Innovation Programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Grant Agreement Nos. 691095 and 734873 and Junta de Castilla y Leon-FEDER under Grant Nos. BU079U16 and UBU-16-B.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Microbiology. 2020, V. 11, art. 1943en
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectSaccharomyces cerevisiaeen
dc.subjectBiological responseen
dc.subjectCommercial graphene oxideen
dc.subjectChelating agenten
dc.subjectRNA isolationen
dc.subjectTranscriptomicsen
dc.subjectDifferential expressionen
dc.subject.otherMicrobiologíaes
dc.subject.otherMicrobiologyen
dc.subject.otherMaterialeses
dc.subject.otherMaterialsen
dc.titleCommonalities and Differences in the Transcriptional Response of the Model Fungus Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Different Commercial Graphene Oxide Materialsen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01943es
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fmicb.2020.01943
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/691095/EU/Developing and implementation of a new generation of nanosafety assessment tools/NANOGENTOOLS/en
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/734873/EU/CO2 absorbing Materials Project- RISE/CO2MPRISE/en
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/Junta de Castilla y León//BU079U16//Avances en nanobiofísica del ADN, nanofibras y evaluación de la nanoseguridad de materiales/NANOBIO-FIBERSAFE/es
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/Junta de Castilla y León//UBU-16-B/es
dc.identifier.essn1664-302X
dc.journal.titleFrontiers in Microbiologyen
dc.volume.number11es
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones


Ficheros en este ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem