Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorSantiago Herrera, Mario 
dc.contributor.authorIbáñez Porras, Jesús 
dc.contributor.authorDe Pamphilis, Marco
dc.contributor.authorAlegre Calderón, Jesús Manuel 
dc.contributor.authorTamayo Ramos, Juan Antonio 
dc.contributor.authorMartel Martín, Sonia 
dc.contributor.authorBarros García, Rocío 
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-03T07:48:40Z
dc.date.available2023-05-03T07:48:40Z
dc.date.issued2023-04
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10259/7664
dc.description.abstractEnvironmental awareness and the necessary reduction in costs in industrial processes has facilitated the development of novel techniques such as Additive Manufacturing, decreasing the amount of raw materials and energy needed. The longing for improved materials with different and enhanced properties has resulted in research efforts in the Metal Matrix Composites field. These two novelties combined minimise environmental impacts and costs without compromising technical properties. Two technologies can feed Additive Manufacturing techniques with metallic powder: Gas Atomization and High Energy Ball Milling. This study provides a comparative Life Cycle Assessment of these technologies to produce one kilogram of metallic powder for the Directed Energy Deposition technique: a Ti6Al4V alloy, and a Ti6Al4V-TiC Metal–Matrix Composite, respectively. The LCA methodology is according to ISO 14040:2006, and large amounts of information on the use of raw materials, energy consumption, and environmental impacts is provided. Different impact categories following the Environmental Footprint methodology were analysed, showing a big difference between both technologies, with an 87.8% reduction of kg CO2 eq. emitted by High Energy Ball Milling in comparison with Gas Atomization. In addition, an economic analysis was performed, addressing the viability perspective and decision making and showing a 17.2% cost reduction in the conventional process.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant Agreement No. 814552) in the context of the LightMe project. It also received funds from the Board of Education of Junta de Castilla y León and the European Social Fund (EDU/1508/2020).en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherMDPIes
dc.relation.ispartofSustainability. 2023, V. 15, n. 8, 6649en
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectLife cycle assessmenten
dc.subjectMetal–matrix compositeen
dc.subjectAdditive manufacturingen
dc.subjectTitaniumen
dc.subjectGas atomizationen
dc.subjectHigh energy ball millingen
dc.subject.otherMaterialeses
dc.subject.otherMaterialsen
dc.titleComparative Life Cycle Assessment and Cost Analysis of the Production of Ti6Al4V-TiC Metal–Matrix Composite Powder by High-Energy Ball Milling and Ti6Al4V Powder by Gas Atomizationen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/su15086649es
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su15086649
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/814552/EU/An Open Innovation Ecosystem for upscaling production processes of lightweight metal alloys composites/LightMe/en
dc.identifier.essn2071-1050
dc.journal.titleSustainabilityen
dc.volume.number15es
dc.issue.number8es
dc.page.initial6649es
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones


Ficheros en este ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem