Universidad de Burgos RIUBU Principal Default Universidad de Burgos RIUBU Principal Default
  • español
  • English
  • français
  • Deutsch
  • português (Brasil)
  • italiano
Universidad de Burgos RIUBU Principal Default
  • Ayuda
  • Contact Us
  • Send Feedback
  • Acceso abierto
    • Archivar en RIUBU
    • Acuerdos editoriales para la publicación en acceso abierto
    • Controla tus derechos, facilita el acceso abierto
    • Sobre el acceso abierto y la UBU
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of RIUBUCommunities and CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Compartir

    View Item 
    •   RIUBU Home
    • E-Prints and Research Data
    • Untitled
    • Untitled
    • Artículos GIEC
    • View Item
    •   RIUBU Home
    • E-Prints and Research Data
    • Untitled
    • Untitled
    • Artículos GIEC
    • View Item

    Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/10259/11604

    Título
    Which Maker and STEAM integration styles stand out in education? A systematic review of pedagogical practices in teacher education
    Autor
    Calheiro, Lisiane Barcellos
    Greca Dufranc, Ileana MaríaUBU authority Orcid
    Publicado en
    International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 2026, V. 36, n. 2, p. 951-981
    Editorial
    Springer
    Fecha de publicación
    2026-04
    ISSN
    0957-7572
    DOI
    10.1007/s10798-025-10017-y
    Abstract
    The growing demand to prepare teachers to face 21st-century educational challenges has driven the adoption of active methodologies, including the integration of STE(A)M education and the Maker model. These approaches foster critical thinking, creativity, and collaboration through practical skills and interdisciplinary experimentation. This study systematically reviews the literature to identify styles of Maker model integration in science teacher education at the basic education level, as well as challenges and strategies for its implementation. The analysis revealed a predominance of the collaborative style, followed by subordinate and peripheral approaches. Most studies reported positive impacts on teaching confidence, technical skills, and interest in innovative pedagogical practices. However, challenges such as limited curriculum time, restricted access to resources, and the need for continuous training hinder effective implementation. Additionally, the Maker model remains underrepresented in developing countries, highlighting the need for further research across diverse cultural and economic contexts. Integrating the Maker model with STE(A)M education significantly enhances teacher training, fostering a more dynamic and innovative learning environment. However, successful implementation requires institutional support, curriculum alignment, and ongoing professional development. The study underscores that different integration styles—collaborative, peripheral, and subordinate—must be adapted to teachers’ needs and educational systems. While findings are promising, broader analyses are needed to strengthen the empirical foundation on the impact of these methodologies in basic education.
    Palabras clave
    STE(A)M Education
    Maker Model
    Teacher Training
    Basic Education
    Materia
    Profesores-Formación profesional
    Teachers-Training of
    URI
    https://hdl.handle.net/10259/11604
    Versión del editor
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-025-10017-y
    Collections
    • Artículos GIEC
    Atribución 4.0 Internacional
    Documento(s) sujeto(s) a una licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional
    Files in this item
    Nombre:
    Barcellos-ijtde_2026.pdf
    Tamaño:
    1.059Mb
    Formato:
    Adobe PDF
    Thumbnail
    FilesOpen

    Métricas

    Citas

    Ver estadísticas de uso

    Export

    RISMendeleyRefworksZotero
    • edm
    • marc
    • xoai
    • qdc
    • ore
    • ese
    • dim
    • uketd_dc
    • oai_dc
    • etdms
    • rdf
    • mods
    • mets
    • didl
    • premis
    Show full item record

    Universidad de Burgos

    Powered by MIT's. DSpace software, Version 5.10