Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorSkaf Revenga, Marta 
dc.contributor.authorRevilla Cuesta, Víctor 
dc.contributor.authorSan José Lombera, José Tomás
dc.contributor.authorLópez Ausín, Víctor 
dc.contributor.authorManso Villalaín, Juan Manuel 
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-26T11:26:08Z
dc.date.available2025-02-26T11:26:08Z
dc.date.issued2023-06
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-031-32518-2
dc.identifier.issn2366-2557
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10259/10257
dc.descriptionComunicación oral presentado en: Building for the Future: Durable, Sustainable, Resilient (fib symposium) 2023, celebrado en Estambul (Turquía) durante los días 5-7 de junio.es
dc.description.abstractThere is a need to promote high performance and sustainable construction materials such as Self-Compacting Concrete (SCC) made from various wastes. In concrete manufacturing, there is a general tendency to worsen the workability and mechanical behavior when working with wastes instead of natural raw materials. It is therefore necessary to use multi-criteria algorithms to analyze the impact of using sustainable materials, and to balance the increase in sustainability with the deterioration of certain performances, such as flowability and strength. In addition, it is also necessary to include a cost analysis in the study, which allows us to find the most suitable products for varied real-life applications. In this research, 19 SCC mixes have been manufactured, where conventional materials (CEM I, natural aggregates, and limestone filler) are progressively substituted by more sustainable ones (Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag -GGBFS- replacing cement, and Recycled Concrete Aggregate -RCA- in coarse, fine and filler sizes of the aggregate). The designed mixes are analyzed based on different criteria: mechanical criteria (flowability, compressive strength and modulus of elasticity), sustainability (carbon footprint) and cost. Five different scenarios are proposed for different priorities or situations, which are evaluated using three multi-criteria algorithms. Some of the conclusions of the study show that coarse RCA and limestone fines perform adequately in most scenarios. Fine RCA rates above 50% were not recommended in any of the scenarios. A versatile design would be an SCC with RCA coarse aggregate, limestone fines, GGBFS and 0% fine RCA.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Universities, MICINN, AEI, EU, ERDF and NextGenerationEU [grant numbers PID2020-113837RB-I00; 10.13039/501100011033; TED2021-129715B-I00]; the Junta de Castilla y León (Regional Government) and ERDF [grant number UIC-231]; and the University of Burgos [grant number SUCONS, Y135.GI].en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherSpringeres
dc.relation.ispartofBuilding for the Future: Durable, Sustainable, Resilient (fib Symposium). 2023, V. 349, p. 679-688es
dc.subjectCarbon footprinten
dc.subjectGround granulated blast furnace slagen
dc.subjectRecycled Concrete Aggregateen
dc.subjectSelf-compacting concreteen
dc.subjectConcrete optimizationen
dc.subject.otherMateriales de construcciónes
dc.subject.otherBuilding materialsen
dc.subject.otherHormigón-Ensayoses
dc.subject.otherConcrete-Testingen
dc.titleDesign Optimization of Self-compacting Concrete with Residues for Different Scenariosen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectes
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-32519-9_66es
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-031-32519-9
dc.identifier.essn2366-2565
dc.volume.number349es
dc.page.initial679es
dc.page.final688es
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersiones


Ficheros en este ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem