Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorDiez Pastor, José Francisco 
dc.contributor.authorLatorre Carmona, Pedro 
dc.contributor.authorArnaiz González, Álvar 
dc.contributor.authorCanepa Oneto, Antonio Jesús 
dc.contributor.authorRuiz Pérez, Javier
dc.contributor.authorZurro, Débora
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-16T12:38:39Z
dc.date.available2026-01-16T12:38:39Z
dc.date.issued2024-07
dc.identifier.issn2192-6352
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10259/11235
dc.description.abstractPhytolith analysis is now an essential technique, both for the reconstruction of past environmental and climatic changes and for the study of anthropic and faunal plant use, in such disciplines as archaeology, paleoecology, paleonthology, and palynology. Currently, phytolith identification and categorisation involves time-consuming and tedious manual classification tasks that are not always error free. Automated phytolith classification will be key to the standardisation of phytolith identification processes, circumventing human error in the phytolith identification process. In this paper, a comparative analysis is presented of different types of feature sets, feature combinations, and classifier combinations (through stacking), and their use for automatic phytolith classification, including state-of-the-art vision transformers and convolutional neural networks, techniques which have shown remarkable progress within different areas, including computer vision. In this research, twenty-two different sets of features (three based on shape, sixteen on appearance, and three on texture) and six classifier strategies (single and combined via stacking) were compared. The experimental results revealed that texture-related features offered no valuable information for classification purposes. However, classification tasks were efficiently performed with strategies based on shape and appearance features (extracted using deep neural networks). More specifically, the use of those features combined with a stacking strategy, achieved better results than any other features and feature-based strategies, with an accuracy value of 98.32%.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work is supported by the Junta de Castilla y León under project BU055P20 (JCyL/FEDER, UE) and the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation under project PID2020-119894GB-I00 co-financed through European Union FEDER funds.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherSpringeres
dc.relation.ispartofProgress in Artificial Intelligence. 2024, V. 13, n. 3, p. 217-244es
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectPhytolith classificationen
dc.subjectFeature extractionen
dc.subjectFeature combinationen
dc.subjectStackingen
dc.subject.otherAprendizaje automáticoes
dc.subject.otherMachine learningen
dc.subject.otherProceso de imágeneses
dc.subject.otherImage processingen
dc.titleTowards automatic phytolith classification using feature extraction and combination strategiesen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13748-024-00331-2es
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s13748-024-00331-2
dc.identifier.essn2192-6360
dc.journal.titleProgress in Artificial Intelligencees
dc.volume.number13es
dc.issue.number3es
dc.page.initial217es
dc.page.final244es
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée